Selling Photos Online



September’09: US$ 3,786.91

Total Revenue from Microstock in 2009: US$ 26,655.95

It’s now easier than ever to earn extra money from your images by selling them online via micro stock photography sites such as Shutterstock, Fotolia, Dreamstime and many more (please keep reading to find out how much I earn from each stock photography site)..

Make money online by selling your digital photos
Join Stock Photography Forum on MyShutterspace

It goes without saying that to be successful your shots need to be ‘good stock photographs’ and available in high resolution format. But presuming that all this is in order, how do you maximize sale ability?

Good Stock Photographs

Firstly, you must know how to take good stock photographs. For those who haven’t heard what stock photography is.. Stock photography is photography or imagery that can be licensed for specific uses. Its use is very popular with designers, graphic artists, art directors, advertising agencies, and marketing professionals, in magazine ads, websites, and marketing brochures. Instead of hiring a professional photographer to create an image, a buyer licenses an image and the photographer is paid a commission. There are many books talk on how you can take good stock photographs, and here are just some of the very basic points;

- No digital noise, please…
Most agencies rank each photo based on it’s overall quality and potential for salability. Make sure your photos are clear, crisp, nicely composed, well lit and most importantly free of digital noise caused by high iso, underexposure, long exposures and over-processing.

- No snapshots or tourist-like photos, please…
Do not ever think that you’ll earn lots of money by selling your snapshots or tourist-like photos. This is not a get rich quick scheme. Your photos must be commercially in demand and highly usable for art directors or designers. You can take a look at the most popular files once you’ve signed up to an agency to get an idea of what is selling. You can also review other professional sites like GettyImages, Corbis, and Comstock to get some inspirations.

- No logo/copyrighted material, please…
When you’re submitting photos to the microstockphoto agencies, make sure they don’t have any company logos, trademarks, third-party images and brands.

- Ask your model to sign a model release..
Unless if you’re submitting editorial images, you must provide a model release for any recognizable person in your image. Each agency has its own standard model release form that you have to fill in and send along with each image containing a recognizable person. I usually send the same format of model release [Download model release], and send it to all agencies without any problems.

Some useful shooting models tips available on this site:

- Download Free Model Posing Guides
- Choosing and Communicating with Models
- Portrait Photography Tips
- How To Use Light in Photography
- Studio Lighting Video Tutorial

Choosing The Right Photo Agency

You need to find out whether a website will be worth your while by logging on and having a look around. Views the types of images stocked, and determine whether yours are on par with their quality and style. You can check how many visitors (traffic graphs are available below) and the number of times each image has been downloaded. You can also join the community forum usually available on the agency and ask the other members regarding their selling/month, etc. Use this information to answer the question: How likely is it that I will actually sell my images through this website?

Categorizing & Keywording

Sellers can usually place images in more than one category – exploit this by placing yours in as many as possible. The importance of this is that while visitor and site members browse websites, photo buyers shop by category. Getting your photos listed within the right categories ensures they appear in front of the right audience.

Keywords are there to give your photos a further away of being found by searches, and websites will give you a certain amount of characters to play with, which you should exhaust. Keep your keywords simply and accurate. Remember, do NOT enter “junk” keywords or keywords that are not applicable to an image. This will slow down your approval process or even worse, get your photos being rejected.

Here’s a neat online keywording tool to help stock photographers keywording their images with high quality keywords.

Uploading

Usually you have three ways to upload your photos to the agencies. The most common one is using the web upload form which is available on all stock photo agencies. Then you have the ActiveX/Java uploading system which available only on some of the agencies. The last one is via FTP (File Transfer Protocol) software which I think is the easiest way of uploading your photos as what you need to do is to drag and drop your files from your computer to their server. You can also schedule your upload anytime you want (I usually do my uploading at night just before going to sleep). Unfortunately, one of my biggest money maker agencies (ie. Istockphoto) does not have this option available, instead the agency has its own uploading software where you have to pay to get the pro version.

To be able to transfer your photos via FTP you will need an FTP Client such as CuteFTP and FileZilla for Windows users or Cyberduck for Mac users. You can go to software repository sites such as download.com or tucows.com to find your FTP client program, read the user reviews, download & install it to your computer.

Below are some stock agencies where I submit my photos to..

DREAMSTIME

dreamstime-traffic
Visit Dreamstime

Dreamstime has been online since 2000 as a Royalty-Free stock photography website, selling CD imagery. The concept has been redesigned, upgraded and adapted to the market’s need, evolving into a powerful and active community in March 2004. Your commission is .50 for each photo downloaded, but I believe your commision would increase as more people donwload your photos. Please visit their site to check the detail of their royalty figure.

September’09 Earnings: $1365.25 (1131 photos online)

SHUTTERSTOCK

Shutterstock is different than other stock models. Buyers subscribe on a monthly basis and can download up to 750 images over the course of 30 days. You’ll get 25 cents every time one of your images is downloade. Uploading photos is easy, they have 3 uploading system; (FTP, HTML, and activeX). The community forum is also a great place to hangout with bunch of friendly people.

shutterstock-traffic
Visit Shutterstock

September’09 Earnings: $852.63 (1090 photos online)

BIGSTOCKPHOTO

Since launching the site last May 2005, BigStockPhoto has grown to over 110,000 images, with 6,000 added weekly. With 11,000 buyers and 3,100 photographers, it’s one of the fastest growing stock photo sites. The site has a sophisticated search engine, multiple light boxes that can be shared with friends and colleagues, how-to articles and tutorials, forums, and an easy-to-use features for uploading and downloading photos. Whenever a person downloads one of your photos, your account balance increases by 50 cents, you can also make up to $20.00 for special licensed photo sold.

bigstockphoto-traffic
Visit BigStockPhoto

September’09 Earnings: $221.53 (1253 photos online)

123RF

123RF.com is wholly owned by Inmagine. They have been in the Royalty Free industry since year 2000 and had since accumulated a strong database of repeated users. Prices for single images are available in low-res, med-res and high-res and are set at $1, $2 and $3 respectively. You will be paid a direct 50% of the actual price for each of your image sold.You can also earn money from their subscription revenue which is based on the total of downloaded images that belong to you and on the total revenue in that particular month.

123rf-traffic
Visit 123RF

September’09 Earnings: $68.53 (1245 photos online)

ISTOCKPHOTO

Some say it’s the first and the biggest microstock agency online today. No wonder if istock has more skillful photographers than other agencies. Which means, more competition for you photographers. Your photos have to be really stand out to be able to sell well in this agency.

istockphoto-traffic
Visit Istockphoto

Note:

In general, Istock is the agency that rejected most of my photos. From 95 photos submitted this month they only accepted probably around 15 of them :(. They also have this ridiculous upload limits for non exclusive contributors. If you’re a new member (base) you can upload 15 photos per week (that’s right! you have to wait for 168 hours until you can submit another batch of 15 photos). If you’ve been there for a while like me and have more than 25000 downloads, you can only submit 30 photos per week. Earnings are also decreasing each month. My suggestion is if you’re new and NOT thinking of becoming Istock exclusive contributor just don’t bother to submit on their site since it looks they’re really giving their non-exclusive photographers (or me) a hard time

September’09 Earnings: $313.32 (698 photos online)

FOTOLIA

Fotolia is the newest micro-stock photo agency and really has a lot of earning potential.For each photograph sold, the photographer receives a commission based on the type of license sold to the customer. Fotolia currently has a local presence in 5 major countries: USA, France, Spain, Germany, and UK. Biy mid 2006 they plan to be in all English speaking countries and all major European countries. For more info about their commision structure, please visit http://www.fotolia.com

fotolia-traffic
Visit Fotolia

September’09 Earnings: $965.65 (1160 photos online)
| back to top


Professional Photography Secrets
Complete Homestudy Package: How to work from home with photography.

Photography Business System
A home based business opportunity that allows you to earn $900+ per day taking portraits of children and pets. (No Studio Required)


FAQs

1. Can I make a living out of this?

Well, I think it all depends on which country you’re living in. But here’s an idea on your earning potential from the industry. Meet Yuri Arcurs, a full time stock photographer and a uni student at Aarchus University. He makes $300/day (times that by 30 days, which is around $9000/month) by selling his photos on Shutterstock alone!! Now, that’s the figure you and I should aiming for because I’m sure you can have a pretty good life in whichever country you’re living in with more than 10K/month (and it keeps growing if you keep taking photos).

make-big-money-from-stock-photo
Click to enlarge

2. Can you post the same photo on multiple stock photography websites?

Yes, you can..unless if you choose for being exclusive with Dreamstime or any other agencies that offer exclusivity. Then, you MUST only submit your photos to that agency.

3. What type of photography seems to be the most profitable?

Shoot what you like.. But keep in mind that your photos must be commercially in demand. While some photographers say that people photos always sell really good, my best sellers have always been landscape/travel photographs.

4. Are you selling the same photos at multiple agencies?

Yes, I am.. as I’m not being exclusive to any agency and I’m selling all my photos as Royalty Free.

5. How do you increase your sales?

I think the key is you have to upload lots and lots good photos. See FAQ no. 1 above for an inspiration.

6. Do you have any keywording tips?

Please check out the keywording tips posts here, here, and here

7. Can I see your portfolio?

Sure, You can go to my photoblog to see samples of my work.

8. Are there any software that can be used to save time managing my stock photos?

iSyndica has created an online platform that lets photographers easily submit their content to several stock agencies. The software has the ability to submit your images to over 20 microstock photo agencies in minutes, if not seconds. Please check out our article; How to save time selling your stock photos to find out more about the software and the coupon code that can get you 50% off any subscriptions for 3 months.

9. How much do you earn each month?

Below is my earning stats from September 2005

TOTAL EARNINGS
September’09: US$ 4,203.05
August’09: US$ 3,637.00
July’09: US$ 3,537.00
June’09: US$ 3,663.35
May’09: US$ 3,098.32
April’09: US$ 3,094.72
March’09: US$ 3,141.53
February’09: US$ 2,899.51
January’09: US$ 2,766.47

Total Revenue from Microstock in 2008: US$30,521.71

December’08: US$ 2,609.72
November’08: US$ 2,615.78
October’08: US$ 2,622.24
September’08: US$ 2,614.5
August’08: US$ 2596.61
July’08: US$ 2248.64
June’08: US$ 2546.61
May’08: US$ 2874.93
April’08: US$ 2687.79
March’08: US$ 2381.30
February’08: US$ 2455.02
January’08: US$ 2241.39

Total Revenue from Microstock in 2007: US$25,662.79

December’07: US$1707.33
November’07: US$2035.89
October’07: US$2124.36
September’07: US$2034.24
August’07: US$1966.26
July’07: $1987.43
June’07: $2048.15
May’07: $2278.92
April’07: $2354.59
March’07: $2561.99
February’07:: $2194.88
January’07: $2368.75

Total Revenue from Microstock in 2006: US$23,725.79

December’06: $1840.20
November’06: $2025.67
October’06: $1722.91
September’06: $1876.76
August’06: $2038.33
July’06: $1921.87
June’06: $2060.23
May’06: $2286.5
April’06: $1924.50
March’06: $2120.35
February’06: $2062.70
January’06: $1845.84

Total Revenue from Microstock in 2005: US$5,004.14

December’05: $1216.83
November’05: $1421.92
October’05: $1384.59
September’05: $980.80

Note:
This page would be updated every month (next update: 1st of July 2009)


See also: MicroStock Photography | Photography Business



AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

Share your photos with our readers, make your own profile page, create blog, get unlimited storage for your photos, discuss photography equipment & techniques by joining our photo community



Print This Post | Email This Post

Subscribe for our latest updates sent to your e-mail (no spam)


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

RSS feed | Trackback URI

535 Comments »

Comment by Indra
2005-11-18 14:52:37

this site is cool!….i like it, and i want to try to make money from my photo too.

Comment by Menank
2009-08-28 04:00:14

hey but hw can we actually sell my pics hw much money do we get

 
 
Comment by Darcy
2006-01-14 07:39:44

Great site. I was wondering if you upload the same picture or can you upload the same picture to more then one online stock agency.

Thanks Darcy

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-01-14 08:53:13

You can upload the same pictures to more than one site..Unless if you’re exclusive with Istockphoto..then, you can only upload to them.

Good Luck!

Comment by Carlos Gomes Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-24 18:50:03

Hello
I was wondering if you can help me.
How did you get good photos with your canon d300.
I bought the same camera just because you said that you started with that one and you took acceptable photos to sell on the web.
I try to take the photos in jpeg mode but they are to small (3.2 mb) to sell on the web.
They accept as minimum 4.0 mb. Sow i try taken the photos in raw mode witch gives me a size of 5.2mb but then i have to change the format to jpeg and it goes down to 3.2mb again.
I am a bit lost now. Can you help me?
Please reply direct to my email adress.
Carlos Gomes

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-02-24 22:08:00

I shot in RAW and then converted them to JPEG (maximum quality) using photoshop with Canon EOS 300D (not D300). It’s a 6.3 million effective pixels digital SLR camera and it was enough to take great photos for stock.

Comment by carlos gomes Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-25 17:42:03

Hello again

Thanks for the reply, when you shot in raw mode and then convert it to jpeg how havy does your photos get?
Cause mines go down to 3.2mb when i convert it.Does the same happends to yours to?
How havy does your photos get after converting them?
Thank you
Carlos Gomes

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jon
2009-08-27 08:30:51

Carlos - you are confusing megabytes (MB) with megapixels (MP). You can have a 3.2MB (megabyte) photo that has a 10MP (megapixel) resolution. Your 3.2MB (megabyte) .jpg files should be just fine.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Will
2006-04-29 14:27:39

so appx how many pictures have you uploaded at one of those websites? im a struggling designer/photographer, just did my first wedding actually, but this seems like a great way to have some money on the side. you have a great website btw, keep up the good work
(:

 
Comment by veedee
2006-05-09 22:53:58

Very interesting, this article has open up my mind. I really want to make money online beside the add stuff. Just wonder, is paypal the only payment form they used? I’d love to have payment by check

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-06-07 02:16:53

Will, as u can see above..I have around 500-700 photos at each stock site. The more photos you’ve got the more earnings you’ll get each month.

Veedee..I’m sure that they also have payment option by check..

 
Comment by Scott Haneda
2006-06-08 14:05:25

Is there any way to see some samples of the images you sent in so we can get an idea of what they are looking for to get returns like you are?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-06-08 14:21:48

You can go to photoblogku.com, most of photos there are also available at those stock sites..

 
Comment by Tony Harrison
2006-06-19 23:29:42

Can you recommend any interpolation software to upsize images to suit the image library requirements? I know of Genuine Fractals but not really any others.

Comment by David Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-14 03:33:53

Capture NX enables you to ‘upsize’ images for Alamy.

 
 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-06-20 08:49:33

I only use GF and it works like a charm..The software is also recommended by Alamy.

 
Comment by Beau
2006-06-26 02:16:41

Hi, I was just wondering what some of your most popular photos are because i’m interested in selling some of my photos but most are nature/scenery related.

Comment by Russell
2008-11-21 21:29:32

Right now, photographic websites are crying for more photos. Most are struggling to accommodate the hundreds of thousands of image buyers currently browsing through their websites. Seriously, photos are in such high demand that Getty Images (the parent of iStockphoto) reported annual revenue of $857.6 million in 2007 - and since most of their pictures sell for around $2 to $15 - it doesn’t take a genius to see how lucrative this business can be. Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-06-26 18:55:11

While other photographers have good sales on people & lifestyle photographs, my best sellers have been travel related photographs such as tropical beaches, mountains, the outback, etc..

 
Comment by giles
2006-07-05 17:57:29

hi,
just checking, you may have already mentioned - how do you receive payment from each online agency?
cheers

 
Comment by eirikso
2006-07-05 19:10:55

I am running a technology related blog and spend a bit of time taking pictures and making illustrations. From time to time people ask for permission to use my pictures commercially.

I am looking for a site that would allow me to upload a couple of pictures and handle the transactions if people want to buy non exclusive rights.

For me it seems like most of the sites you mention here is based on volume. If you have a couple of hundred pictures out there you can make some money.

Do you know any sites that could let me set a better price because people have contacted me specifically to buy one particular picture?

I found this one:shutterpoint[.]com

…but they want payment for the storage of my pictures…

Comment by Daniel
2007-09-07 17:05:17

@ above poster.

I suggest you try Image Vortex, they allow you to set whatever price you like for your images & no charge for hosting. Similar to the other sites in terms of reviewing & approval etc but perhaps more suited to what you have in mind?

ATB Daniel

Comment by Dawn
2009-10-29 23:07:18

Thank you for the help.Sincerely, Dawn

 
 
 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-07-05 20:47:37

Giles..I always receive my payment thorough paypal from all agencies mentioned above, accept for alamy, where they have bank transfer payment option to australia…

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-07-05 20:54:59

Hi eirikso, you might want to buy one of those sofwares where you can make your own photo site then upload your own pictures and sell it on your site. With this, you can set your own price..and don’t have to bother to pay any commisions..

 
Comment by eirikso
2006-07-06 05:02:59

Thank you for your reply. I have Gallery running on my site. I will look into the possibilities that exist for that software. My host also let me install Zen Cart.

Until then I’ll do an experiment with shutterpoint.com just to have a possibility to sell my pictures and accept all kinds of payment when people ask.

The price of Shutterpoint might pay itself compared to the time I need to set up my own shop… :-)

 
Comment by Olugbenga
2006-07-06 06:19:39

Hi eirikso, You might want to try photographersdirect.com. They have the best deal of all.Check them out and you will see what I mean.

Nuff regards
Olugbenga

 
Comment by Mike
2006-08-01 15:03:34

Hello, very very nice web site. Thanks for being so open and helpful to the rest of us.

I have two questions if I may:

1) You have 250-600 photos on these web sites. Do you have to keep adding more photos at certain intervals to maintain the income, or did you just post all your good photos once and now you are raking the benefits?

2) Are all of these 250-600 photos taken with 6+ MP cameras, or are you able to make any money with as low as 2 MP cameras also?

Thanks for your response.

Mike

 
Comment by Elena
2006-08-04 09:42:14

Hi eirikso!
You can try http:/www.featurepics.com
No payment for the storage + your own price for images

(sorry for the wrong address in the previous post)

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-08-04 14:13:24

Hi Mike, I haven’t added any photos for the last 3 months..and, yup..I took most of my photos with canon eos 300d and sigma lenses, until recently i upgraded my camera to EOS 5D..and added some Canon ‘L’ lenses.. I don’t know anyone shooting with 2MP camera though..

 
Comment by Martin
2006-08-15 22:37:53

I have just started submitting to Alamy. Do you find it better to sell your images through the royalty free or Licenced options? I guess they are both Non exclusive. Using either of these options still allows me to sell images elsewhere, right?
Thanks

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-08-16 13:19:06

Hi Martin, I sell my images through both royalty free & licenced depending on what the images are likely to be used for. There have been many discussions about this on Alamy mailing list at yahoogroups. You might want to join and check out their old message archive. Here’s the link: http://groups.yahoo.com/search?query=alamy

 
Comment by Martin
2006-08-17 11:04:20

Many Thanks for that I have just joined.

 
Comment by Nigel
2006-08-23 21:50:48

Hi, Reading down your lists above how many photographs have you actually uploaded. I see that you have 700+ at Fotolia and only 500+ at shutterstock is that 1200 unique images or actually 200 unique with 500 being hosted on both sites or somewhere between the two.

Also do you know if the make and model of the camera effects the number of downloads… ie images taken with a Nikon or Canon would out sell that of say a Fuji.

Great info by the way.

Thanks

 
Comment by John Bailey
2006-08-25 02:08:05

Great website, I wanted to ask you, do any of the sites you mentioned above place some pictures before others? In other words when someone does a search how can I get my pictures to come to the front of the line?

Thanks and keep up the great work,

John

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-09-09 13:28:15

Nigel… Those are the same photos hosted on both sites. It’s just there’re about 200 photos were accepted at fotolia and rejected at shutterstock.

I don’t see that camera brand will influence your selling. As long as you can take great photos and do your keywording properly, you can earn some good extra money..

John, Keep uploading..they have the search result based on the latest photos being uploaded to their sites..

 
Comment by Vahaj
2006-09-12 16:22:40

Can any company trasnfer the amount that I get by the selling pics to my bank account rather than in check or paypal form cause in my country the chek less to 10000 USD is not cashed. And if not than can I get the facility of money order etc doesn’t matter even if they are going to deduct the cost from the money I earned. Please do help me in this connection I shall be very thankful to you.

 
Comment by Rob
2006-09-22 11:31:13

GREAT STORY! I’ve been on Istock for awhile, but it’s taken me awhile to get any decent downloads going. I mainly like sports, wildlife and landscape. I just passed the 100 mark for images accepted. Would my portfolio do better at another site?

 
Comment by Jim
2006-10-03 07:14:58

Thanks for the great site! Very informative. I had a couple questions.

Are all these uploaded as RF ( royalty free )? I assume if you submit your photos RM ( Rights Managed ) that each photo can only be submitted to one agency.

Thanks,
Jim

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-10-03 09:10:59

Vahaj, I think it’s only alamy that’d transfer your payment to your bank account..Rob, you wouldn’t know if you don’t try it…Jim, yup..those are royalty free images.

 
Comment by Jimie
2006-10-04 17:35:39

Thanks a lot. I have a question. What’s the software to sell photos online? I’ve searched for it but can’t find the answer. Is there a free software or open source?
Thank you

 
Comment by Kim
2006-10-05 15:24:11

How much time, effort and money did you spend to producing the hundreds and hundreds of images required to make a few grand every month?

And once you subtract your expenses and overheads do you actually make any profit at all?

I often make more from a single rights-managed image sale than you make in an entire month of RF micro-stock sales.

Don’t you think your time and resources would be far better spent creating quality imagery for rights-managed stock?

Kim

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-10-05 16:48:25

Jimmie, I did not use any software either..what I usually do is upload my photos with a FTP software to those agency. Except for Istock which has its own software…

Kim..Well, I’m not a pro photographer, and I don’t have any intention to be a pro…Photography is just my hobby, just like travelling. Most photos submitted are usually taken during our family’s holiday. I really think that it’s much better to get them work for me and give me an extra $1500-$2000/month rather than just sitting on my hard drive and do nothing.

Comment by Mart
2009-07-24 17:29:11

Kim makes sense.
The stock agencies you refer to have collections of 3 to 4 million photos available for purchase. Of which thousands have not sold any.
To make the sales you claim, I would guess you would have uploaded hundreds, if not thousands of photos. True?
I’d thint that means you spend a good bit of your life at the computer.
Looking at your samples, you are good. But so are so many others.
(How many did you submit?)

 
 
Comment by Andy
2006-10-08 02:48:37

It’s great story! It’s really cool that making money of your hobby.

Just want to confirm with you - is it ok to submit a photo to all of the sites you listed as Royalty-Free?

Thank you!

 
Comment by DJA
2006-10-09 09:48:09

very nice site !! I am interested in selling photos online.
I really want to make a living doing this.If you could give some advice that would help me achieve my goals - what would it be?
Thanks,DJA

 
Comment by Amia
2006-10-12 04:21:38

Great article, thank you so much! I’m just a tad confused with the comment about “exclusive” with istockphoto means you can’t upload to anyone else. Can you not be exclusive with istock? I’d love to get a group of images on all of these websites, except alamy, and I would have to exclude istock from the list if I could only post certain pics there. Thanks!

 
Comment by Rob
2006-10-21 08:00:59

Amia,
It’s fine to be non-exclusive at Istock. You wouldn’t get any benefits by not uploading elsewhere until you reach 500 downloads anyway. They won’t even call you exclusive until you reach that number.
Rob

 
Comment by tom
2006-10-26 05:41:29

now listen this might sound rely stupid but i dont get how the buyer gets the photo do you send them a print or what

 
Comment by tassos
2006-11-03 01:29:20

hello for some time now i am obsesed with photos, but i dont have a good cammera i only have a 4 megapixel. i now am thinking of getting a new cammera and start selling my photos also. whould a cammera like canon G7 be acceptable by these sites?

 
Comment by tassos
2006-11-03 01:31:26

sorry for the double listing. but i have another question. if i photograph people do i need a special licence from them in order to sell the pictures? and if yes what is the format?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-11-03 18:15:58

Tom, you send/upload your digital photo files to the agencies mentioned above, and buyers buy/donwload the files from those agencies.

Tassos, IMHO..it’d be much2 better if you use Digital SLR cameras such as canon 400D, Nikon D80 etc.. Yup, you’ll need a model release signed by your models to be able to sell their pictures. You can download the model release template from the agencies.

 
Comment by tassos
2006-11-03 21:00:42

what do you think of Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ 50?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-11-04 12:23:53

Tassos.. whatever camera you’re going to get, make sure it’s not prone to digital noise as it’s very influence your photo acceptance rate at the agencies. Eg. I used EOS 300D before, my acceptance rate was around 65-75%..When I bought the EOS 5D a year ago, my acceptance rate was up to around 90%. So, read the reviews..see what editors say about the camera’s noise.. DMC-FZ 50 review roundup is available here: http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz50-review-roundup-sample-photos/

 
Comment by Brian
2006-11-06 13:44:34

ok so i just happened to stumble across this and it seems pretty interesting.

i JUST got a canon rebel xti. i’m assuming that will be good enough quality for photos to sell (hopefully my photos are as well).

are there any other websites that any of you would suggest for me to just find out more information?

i’m no pro photographer either, but i enjoy taking photos, i don’t think i’m terrible at it, and this would give me some motivation and challenge myself to take better photos.

so if anyone has any tips or more information (and have enough free time and courtesy) please e-mail me. calculuzz@gmail.com

i would greatly appreciate any input. thank you.

 
Comment by Martin Hurley
2006-11-11 01:50:11

Hi…

Great site… fascinating.

I’m planning to interview a few photographers about some sell photo questions I had. Would you be interested in participating? It would be good to know your perspective…

Please let me know at your convenience.
I can be reached at hurleyboy AT gmail. com

Any other photographers who have had some success at selling their photos online or off are also most welcome to email me. The benefits to those who contribute will be greater exposure and more promotion for their websites and photography. :-)

I’ve got a newletter on this subject and you can sign up free at my site:
http://hurleypixx.com

Thanks….

Martin H
Thailand

 
Comment by Joseph
2006-11-12 12:14:25

Hello! You have a great source of information here. My question: what software do you use to organize and keep track of your hundreds of photos, and where you have posted them.
Thanks very much

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-11-13 03:08:06

Martin, thank u for your interest.. To be honest, there are tons of microstock-photographers who earn a lot more than I do..Try to ask people in the online forum at the agencies mentioned above, they should give you some good insights regarding the business.

Joseph, I don’t use any softwares to keep track of my photos, I usually check on the online stats page at each agency to see which pictures sold and the total earning of the day.

Comment by lady dee Subscribed to comments via email
2009-04-24 09:15:50

hi, i’m really getting bored of a very meager salary for working 8 hours a day…thanks for passing by this site…i’m getting excited of how to start getting into such money earner fun…when i enter into such agencies mentioned and submit photos, do i need some registrations to fill up? does the country where pics come from matter to them? and can i be paid into my local bank account instead of paypal or other forms?

please…just so excited of doing it..

 
 
Comment by Kelly
2006-11-20 22:31:35

This is a great resource, I’m very interested in selling stock online, as I have a social disorder, and find it hard to work a regular job.

Once I get myself a decent camera and a form of I.D… I’m coming back to this page and taking all of your advice.

 
Comment by Sair
2006-11-21 15:04:45

If you have a person in a picture, but you can’t see who they are (they are a sillhouette, only partially in the picture, etc.) do you still need a model release?

 
Comment by Paul
2006-11-27 04:52:20

Hello! As Kim mentioned before: “Don’t you think your time and resources would be far better spent creating quality imagery for rights-managed stock?”. I see your point in your answer and I agree with it. However, do you have any idea of anybody shooting rights-managed stock (which is not of that much higher quality) and of profits it would make? I mean is it better to supply many micro-stock agencies at the same time or maybe it would be better to contact a more “pro” agency? I see your calculations for micro-stocks. Any idea what capacity and quality I’d have to supply to pro stock agency to get the same money?

 
Comment by Gene
2006-11-27 08:19:31

This “blog” was super informative and I really appreciate the actual list of stock sites with their traffic rankings… that really helps…

I noticed several people asking about selling their photos on their own website using purchased software. I recently found a software which takes all of about 30 mintues to implement, gives you a fully functioning store with full admin , and you don’t need to know anything about building a website. Runs on your own server/website etc. etc… great stuff. if anyone is interested here’s where I found it. http://www.bluegellmedia.com/software_ktools.htm

I tried it out this week and it’s working like a charm.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-11-27 14:19:17

Kelly..All the best !!

Sair.. Nope, you don’t..

Paul.. It’d be interesting to see pro-photographers shooting for big right-managed stock agencies such as getty images sharing their opinion here..

Gene.. Thank you for sharing..

 
Comment by Paul
2006-11-28 08:34:10

Thanks for your answer ! Yes, it’d be definitely intresting to see one of “the big guys” over here.

One more question though: so you have more less 600 photos on each site. Could you share what sells most? What subjects? What do you think of cityscapes, buildings, architecture?

 
Comment by Glen
2006-11-30 03:41:27

Do you think that going exclusive at any RF agency pays more than having your images spread across several agencies? Also, does having a creative network and active forum postings help to sell and market your images? Thanks for all the great info…

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-01 18:52:25

Paul.. Please read the FAQs above.. ;)

Glen.. can’t answer both of your questions as I never try to become exclusive and I hardly post any messages in the forum. :)

 
Comment by David
2006-12-02 02:41:16

Why waste your time on 123rf.com? Stockxpert.com has a lot more clout and a lot more traffic!

Take a look:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/… [url is too long]

 
Comment by AnnA
2006-12-03 14:41:09

A couple of the websites mention that you should have copyright of the photos, e.g. “you must own the rights for each image you upload to our database.”

How do you go about doing this? All my photos are my own, but do I have to copyright them somewhere first?

Cheers

AnnA

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-03 22:29:12

David, It’s because I just had more than 100% increase in revenue at 123rf (and now it’s higher than my earning at stockxpert and a waaay higher than csp), so I thought they started doing the right thing to increase their traffic /sales…

Anna…nope you don’t…Once you take a picture with your camera, you’re automatically holding a copyright for that particular pict.

 
Comment by Mike
2006-12-04 19:53:11

Eirikso, what is your strategy for labeling the pictures that you post? Let’s say you have a great yellow flower picture. Do you spend hours trying to find the latin name, or do you say yellow flower, or just flower? Same discussion goes for landscape shots. Do you label as forest for example, or do you say Impressionamus tree forest from the Tintoarna region of the country Pixelon? Thanks, and keep up the phenomal work!

 
Comment by Paul
2006-12-09 00:39:15

When using FTP upload is there a way to upload to multiple servers at once or do you have to do it one-by-one?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-09 00:50:26

Paul, I’ve been using CuteFTP from GlobalScape where I can schedule the file transfer. What I usually do is schedule all file transfers to multiple servers before go to sleep at nite, and let the FTP program does the rest..

 
Comment by Sarah
2006-12-13 15:59:27

Your earnings seem quite high especially for sites like Dreamstime and Fotolia. You must have an awesome portfolio full of popular downloads. Can you post a link to your portfolio for istock and others?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-14 03:11:40

Sarah, you can visit my photoblog ( http://photoblog.dphotojournal.com ) to see samples of my portfolio

 
Comment by Kim
2006-12-18 04:43:48

hi

is this your main job?

or is it something you do just to earn extra money?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-18 13:16:27

Kim, nope.. I work as multimedia developer and used to do this just to avoid arguments with my wife when it comes of buying those expensive photography equipments ;) … Now, that Ive bought all photo equips I ever wanted, I use the money to pay for my family vacation.

 
Comment by lynn
2006-12-20 12:46:24

Hi,
I don’t know how to say. I find this website at internet. And I have some wonderful pictures of natural scenery, but I’m in China. I don’t know if I can sell my picutres on this website? And how to get payment? Thank you!

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-20 13:52:01

Hi Lynn…There are bunch of photographers from china who sell their pictures from the agencies mentioned above. You can get payment by cheque or paypal.

 
Comment by Adrian [Moldova]
2006-12-20 19:17:21

Congratulations !!!

So… let’s the shootin’ start .

 
Comment by Kim
2006-12-20 21:51:56

do you sell you photo on featurepics.com ?

i have nearly 100 photos on there site, but none of my images have been sold!?

if i really put my time and effect to this, could i do this as my main job?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-20 23:38:30

Kim..No, I dont sell my picts there… As I mentioned on the FAQs above that there are some photographers doing this full time with more than 4000 great images (and growing) with earnings around $7000 - $8000 /month…So, if you love taking pictures and happy with that kind of earning/month then u should go hard do it as your main job.. All the best!

 
Comment by Shaithis
2006-12-21 23:38:49

Great article. I’ve been curious what a skilled photographer could make on those sites. I just started in February. Great info.

 
Comment by Kim
2006-12-22 22:34:28

how many photos did you have up, when you first started making this kind of money (sept 05?)

 
Comment by Elaine
2006-12-23 15:29:33

Do you need a business license to sell your photos?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2006-12-24 21:39:10

Shaitis..Thanks and good luck!

Kim, I actually started back in March 2005, with 10 photos only on Istock and SS..On Sept I had around 250-350 photos..

Elaine..Nope.

 
Comment by Kym
2006-12-27 23:13:04

so only having 250 - 350 photos still makes abit of money?

 
Comment by meg
2006-12-27 23:17:12

is it best to upload your photos to loads of diffrent sites - as many as possible,
or just stick to the good ones, where my photos do well?

what would be your recamended min and max amounts of sites?

 
Comment by zara
2006-12-29 00:58:22

thanx for the informative website…

i have just one question on my mind right now, that is… to all the stockagencies that you have your pictures…do you upload all your pictures same size/resolution for all the agenies…or different stock agency needs different picture size or format? It`s complicating…if you have to do them in different size for each different agency…it`s lots of work resizing for different sites ???

 
Comment by kim
2007-01-01 03:06:56

so i can make quite good money with only 250 photos on sites?

 
Comment by Burt
2007-01-18 14:49:29

Great site. Thanks for all the info. I just uploaded 8 pictures to fotolia, and have already sold 2. Im not really doing this for money, but I sure get a kick out of getting paid for doing something I love. I noticed you said you use L lens. I was considering a sigma lens, do you find the Cannon glass much better?

Thanks again, Burt

 
Comment by Andorbal
2007-01-19 01:18:44

I love this article, thanks for the information!

I’ve got a question for you, though… Right now the two cameras I’ve got are a Fuji S1 Pro (3.2MP DSLR, though it says 6.4) and a Nikon FM10. I’ve got the same set of lenses available for both, and two of them are pretty good lenses.

So my question is, do you think it would be better to start off using the Fuji, even though it’s only 3.2 MP, or try using 35mm film and scanning it? I’ve got access to really good film scanners, though they’re not drum scanners. Ultimately, I’d like to get a Nikon D200 since I can keep my lenses, but I’d like to make sure that my photos can sell at least a little before I can justify the purchase to my better half.

Thanks again for the great site!
Andrew

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-01-22 21:38:31

Sorry for the late respond, just got back from a long vacation and also had some problems with my blog database..

Kym..It’s all coming back to the quality of your photos..

Zara…You can set up an action in photoshop so that resizing can be such an easy job to do..

Meg..I’d upload to sites that already have lots of traffic. You can check the traffic by using the graph provided by alexa.com.

Burt.. I used to have lots of sigma lenses..but now that I have some spare money from stock photography, I sold them all and buy only Canon L lenses. They’re just sharper and the AF is a waaayy faster. (IMHO)

Andorbal.. See how you go with your Fuji. Film is now part of the history(IMHO). Just start with your digital camera, find the best workflow from finding a concept, retouching, keywording, uploading etc…so that when you’re ready to buy your d200..you’re already familiar with your digital workflow and know how to work faster.

 
Comment by Juan Kis
2007-01-23 16:10:35

Hi!

Thank to you article, I finally encorage to sign up and send my pictures to sell.

Also I’m reading a couple of book about stock photography.

One question about the model release. I know the model and the witness need to sing the form, but you have to scan and send to each agency when you upload you images ?

Sorry for my basic question.

Thank you so much!

Juan Kis
kispix.com

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-01-23 22:06:05

Juan..Yup, you’ll need to upload the model release to each agency. Good luck!

 
Comment by Juan Kis
2007-01-24 16:26:58

Thank you! But today I saw an image of the Dalai Lama on ShutterStock

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-1984455.html

In this case, Dalai Lama signed the model release ? What about the paparazzis who take pictures of the celebrities and the images are publish on magazines ?

I love photograph people but I think I have to carry a lot of paper for this bussines right ? Once you scan the model relase, you have to store, or is enougj with a digital scan of it ?

I really apreciate your article and your support.
Buy the way, what your name ?

Thank you so much!

Juan Kis

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-01-25 18:47:47

Juan…That photo is one of the editorial stock photos. At Shutterstock, if you have an image that’s newsworthy, and it contains people, and it doesn’t have a release, then you can select ‘Editorial, does not need release’ at the keywording phase of the submit process.

 
Comment by Kim
2007-01-25 20:27:13

hey

when will you update your earnings for December?

 
Comment by Juan Kis
2007-01-26 01:44:48

Thank you so much!

Now I understand!

 
Comment by Russell
2007-01-26 02:43:42

Hi again - my previous post was not approved for some reason. I mentioned an ebook aimed at selling digital photos. I won’t list the URL again and please know that it is not my book and I am not an affiliate or anything. I was hoping you would take a peek at it and give me your honest opinion. If you need the link just email me.

Also, I really am seeking any recommendations for any other resources you might know of. I’m not a novice photographer but am fairly new to digital photography. I own a Fuji Finepix 3800.

An all-in-one guide claiming to cover all aspects of this business sounds appealing, but I don’t want to waste my money if it is just overhyped, rehashed info easily found on the web.

Thanks,
Russell

 
Comment by quentin budworth
2007-01-26 18:17:43

Hi what a great site - Do you shoot raw or jpeg - I’m shooting the highest resolution I can get on my canon 20D is this a sufficient resolution or should I start shooting RAW?

 
Comment by Kim
2007-01-31 00:26:59

do you guys really want your photos to sell for under 30p?? all the time and effect you put in to taking great photos?

the best site is featurepics.com

you get to choose your own price for all your photos, and choose different liceinces and the site is getting more popular

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-02 22:18:12

Kim..Just updated my earning.. December was slow (as expected), but despite not uploading any photos in January, the revenue was really good.

Russel..I think the best resource is the community forum available at some agencies where you can ask anything to improve your photography & photo selling skills

Quentin… Once you start shooting RAW, you\’ll never go back to JPEG.. ;)

Kim..Thanks for your info. :)

 
Comment by kim
2007-02-18 23:31:10

hi

what is the max amount of photos you are allowed to upload?

is there a max amount?

kim

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-19 11:16:31

Kim.. I don’t think so, as long as you’re uploading good stock photos, they’ll be happy to accept all of your photos..

 
Comment by Dawn
2007-02-20 04:11:49

This site is great! Thank you so much for sharing this kind of information for us.

I do have a question that you may know the answer to (or at least point me in the right direction.) What kind of copyright exsist regarding animals? I shoot alot of wildlife photos as well as at zoo’s and places like cat and dog shows. Would I need a release from the zoo or from the individual pet owners if I wanted to sell the pictures? I found a mound of copyright information about people but have been struggling find more out about animal copyrights.

Thanks for any information.

Dawn

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-20 13:38:57

Hi Dawn, I think you won’t need a model release for your animal photographs. I have uploaded some animal pictures from a local zoo without any problems..

 
Comment by Tami
2007-02-21 10:45:52

I was just wondering there have been many talks about different cameras. So I was just wondering how do you think the Canon 30d camera is. I am interested in buying one. Do you think they would take good enough pick to sell on these sites mentioned above.

Thank You,

Tami

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-21 11:56:23

Tami, around half of my photos submitted to the agencies above were taken using my first DLSR, the 6MP Canon EOS 300D (now discontinued). So, Yes.. The EOS 30D is good enough for you…

You might also want to read this buying advice article submitted by one of our readers..

http://www.dphotojournal.com/digital-photography-tips-buying-advice-save-or-splurge/

 
Comment by Tami
2007-02-21 23:13:16

Thank You. I was also wondering if you could give me some advise about one of the subjects I love to take pictures of. My children! Of course I think the pics are wonderful but hey I’m thier mom. The thing is many people have told me they really are photogenic and the pics I have taken are really good. So what do you think I should do? And if I were to submit them should they be to places that give royalties if so do you know of any reputable places? Thank You For Your help anything you can give me would be great.

Thanks
Tami

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-23 12:56:03

Hi Tami, my fave model all this time has always been my wife.. ;) now that we’re expecting a baby boy soon..Well, I guess he’s going to take her place soon.. :P Most stock photographers are submitting photos of their family, as long as your models are happy .. I don’t see any problems..

You can sell their photos to the agencies that give you more royalties..The thing is they don’t usually sell very often.. You can choose whether you want to sell a picture one time for $70 or sell it 70 times for $1 ..

 
Comment by Tami
2007-02-23 14:53:03

Thank you for your help and congrats on your new baby!!

Tami

 
Comment by mateilama
2007-02-25 21:54:05

Hello to All, specially you Dphotojournal boss!
Your openness is brilliant and am thouroughly thankfull for it.
A week ago i was experiencing a daily headache due to the fact that someone (a friend) took apon herself to organise a photography show based on the web pictures i would send to her evry so often. I have peen taking pictures my head off in NA, Europe, Asia in the last 3 years but never thought about the comercial aspect of it. Now your article and the discussion/links it generated put most of my question to rest. Thank you again. I still have one problem though:

Any of you out there has some tips on making a picture seen on my screen (mac powerpc) look the same in print (color synch site/article?, printer?…) thanks a milion.

here is a site that some of you may find useful re copyrights: http://www.creativecommons.org
m

 
Comment by George
2007-02-26 18:29:06

So, what is the percentage of your income that you get for your referrals that you don’t mention on this site? How many sales each of of your photographs generates as compared to the income from referrals. Thanks.

 
Comment by Timmy
2007-02-26 18:58:25

Hi, thanks for this great article..
I was just wondering whether I’d need a model release if I’d submit photo of myself (I am also the photographer)…since am having problem finding models.. thank you..

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-26 19:11:43

mateilama… I\’m a PC person, so i don\’t know much about Mac.. But I\’m sure you can calibrate your monitor and printer on budget using those calibration tools such as PrintFix Pro from colorvision and Eye-One from Pantone.. I\’m planning to get one myself since I\’ll be starting shooting wedding soon and will need to have a good printout photos.

George.. Not much at all.. I\’d say around 2-3% and I did not add them to my earnings published here. Most of the referred photographers only applied but did not submit any photos.

Timmy… Yup, If you\’re a both the model and the photographer you\’d still need to fill up the model releases and sign them… Good luck!

 
Comment by Timmy
2007-02-26 19:19:20

Thank you for your prompt reply.

Just one more question, I’m planning to get some lights (with softbox etc), but most of them are so damn expensive.. Do you know any place to buy those equipments online?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-02-26 19:40:19

Timmy.. Have you tried Ebay? My friend just bought light equipments for his home studio on Ebay for around US1200 for 3 lights (600W), transmitter, 2 softboxes, barn door and other accesories. They are made in China and he says with that kind of price, the quality is quite good.

 
Comment by kim
2007-02-27 07:01:08

hi

are your earnings in us dollers?

 
Comment by kim
2007-02-27 07:10:55

what other stock sites are you with?

 
Comment by Steve
2007-02-27 21:07:30

I have a question regarding receiveing payments. Earlier in these posts, you mentioned that you can choose to have payments made via PayPal or check. Does PayPal charge their fee on the received money? I’m curious because when I sell on eBay, any type of payment I receive gets the 2-3% PayPal payment processing fee pulled out. If you opt to select to receive payments by check, is there a charge for them to mail it to you? Thanks in advcance and keep up the good work & success!

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-01 14:28:30

Kim..yup, they are in US dollars and I also with alamy, but have no sales since last october :(

Steve.. I don’t think they will charge you for money withdrawal..But if you need to transfer your money to your bank outside US (like I do), they will apply a 2.5% exchange rates fees for international withdrawal (australia) :(

Comment by Ken Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-04 20:10:31

Thanks for your generous sharing.
As for Paypal, is it necessary to use Paypal Premier or Business Account to receive the payments? Or you just the Paypal Personal Account will do?
Thanks

 
 
Comment by Forestwander
2007-03-02 02:48:43

I have a site and several others that I publish my work to. I have not made the thousands that you cliam but I enjoy what I am doing and I feel it will be more lucrative in the future. My work mostly consists of nature and landscape photography since I live in West Virginia which is almost heaven!

 
Comment by Donna H
2007-03-02 08:01:25

Thanks for this great website. I’ve learned a lot and now think I’m ready to buy the camera. Shot film for years - made some covers and articles with dumb luck. Would I be better, with limited funds, to buy a 8+ megapixel and a super-duper lens than going whole hog with the 10 megapixel and a stock lens? Was considering the Canon xti but read lots of bad reviews about the lens they include with the camera. Thanks!

Donna

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-02 14:20:59

Forestwander…Just checked out your gallery and mate, you’re so lucky living in such beautiful place..

Donna… Here’s something you should remember; never buy an entry level DLSR camera with the kit lens included. Canon Xti is a great camera and it’s good enough for shooting stocks. Just buy the camera (body only), then get yourself some Canon L lenses. Which lenses you should buy is all depends on your budget. If you give me some ideas on what your budget is.. I can help you with lens recommendations.

 
Comment by Donna H
2007-03-02 16:31:19

I was looking a under 1k but….seems the body is 700+/- and the most likely lens is the 70-200mm f/4L for almost 600 (unless I can find better deals). My film Pentax was/is a work horse with the 70-210 and I rarely changed it out. Most of my photos are outdoors: horses, cows, birds, landscapes, wildlife, etc. I don’t use a tripod.

Am I on the right track or do you have a better suggestion? Thanks!

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-02 17:20:31

If I were you, with 1K to spend on I’d go with the Canon Digital Rebel XT 8MP DSLR and the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS. They are both priced nicely at around 1K and the IS would be very useful since you don’t use a tripod. If anyone has any good suggestions, feel free to post it here..

 
Comment by Donna H
2007-03-03 14:59:43

Thanks for the information. I’ll pencil it all out and see where I end up…

Donna

 
Comment by kim
2007-03-05 22:51:27

can you put a link to your photos that actually works?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-06 10:02:12

Kim.. http://photoblogku.com/index.php?showimage=206 - That image has been sold like more than 350 times on ss + is alone..

 
Comment by owen
2007-03-07 09:12:47

do you / would you sell your photos rights managed?

 
Comment by andrew
2007-03-08 14:23:04

Hi,

I have a question regarding copyright. Whats to stop some enterprising type from downloading a bunch of images from various sources and setting up a site to resell them? it would be difficult to police.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-08 15:47:14

Owen.. Maybe, Maybe not..

Andrew.. I think you better ask the agency where you want to submit your photos to.. They should be able to explain it to you..

 
Comment by greg
2007-03-13 08:52:44

g’day mate,

Great site and I appreciate your candor on so many issues. I was wondering if you have any tips on keywording you can divulge. Also, is there a reason why you don’t list Alamy payment receipts on your tally? I have just applied to them and am curious about what to expect.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-14 10:20:30

Greg.. I use photoshop CS2/Adobe Bridge to embed keywords and other IPTC info to my photos, and I don’t have any luck with Alamy.. I’ve got around 400 photos online, but have no sales since October’06.

 
Comment by dusty
2007-03-20 16:11:15

Very informative blog and thanks for sharing your success story with us!
How many keywords do you embed per image and how do you determine which keyword is the most suitable? Do you use any special software for choosing the right keywords?

 
Comment by Leon
2007-03-20 22:04:15

What prevents people for downloading your photos without paying for them? Is it the on-the-fly watermarks some of these sites add to your photo?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-03-20 23:53:13

Dusty… I usually embed maximum of 50 keywords and using the microsoft word to find synonyms.. There’s a great keywording tip at Dreamstime stock photography blog that you might want to check them out..

Leon… yup, you’re right.

 
Comment by Dusty
2007-03-21 09:35:34

Thanks for your prompt response. I will check out the keywording tips at dreamstime and see what I find.

 
Comment by Gary
2007-04-04 11:02:10

Do you recommend sharpening photos before uploading to an online site for consideration?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-04-05 18:32:16

Gary, I had couple of photos shot with my budget sigma lenses sharpened and got rejected in my early submissions sometime ago..Since then I just submit my images without any sharpening., and that’s good so I can spend my time more on keywording..

 
Comment by Mike
2007-04-10 00:28:26

Great and very informative website! Thanks for sharing your experience and success with us.

I started upload photo to several websites you mentioned here about 4 months ago (total monthly about $400 currently), and the best site for me is SS (50%). Looking your income history, it seems you had a big jump in Jan 2006, and stayed around $2000 for almost a year afterward. Would you be willing to share your reason for the big jump and stay flat afterward? I am assuming you have been kept uploading every month which should lead to a constant income increase trend.

Thanks in advance!

Mike

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-04-11 02:36:59

MIke.. It looks like you’re on the right track, keep it up!

The sudden jump was caused by around 200 photos of my vacation to Indonesia uploaded on that month alone..and no, I haven’t been kept uploading every month, I normally upload tons of photos every time I get back from a long family vacation which usually happens in December/January… then I could stop uploading anything for the next 2-3 months or even longer..

 
Comment by Mike
2007-04-12 01:10:49

Thanks for your quick reply. I really appreciate it.

I will send you an E-mail in your DT website.

 
Comment by Mike
2007-04-13 01:05:52

Thanks for your review and comment on DT. I am glad to hear that without continous uploading you could keep a constant income. It seems to me more buyers like travel/landscape photos in SS. Do you have any experience on editiorial photos with SS?

Thanks,

Mike

 
Comment by Sheri Coleman
2007-04-13 13:54:04

I have two questions for you, please ~

1. Is there an easy way to reduce or get rid of digital noise? I have a 3.2 megapixel Olympus.

2. What do you think of photographersdirect.com and
featurepics.com ?

Thanks so much for some the information and fantastic pictures!!!!!

Sheri

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-04-13 19:12:23

Mike.. I don’t have any editorial photos with SS or any other agencies.. But I know people that have some good experience with editorial photos at alamy. So you might want to try both agencies.

Sheri… you can use noise reduction software such as Noiseware

I haven’t had any experience with both of them..but by looking at their alexa stats: here and here it looks like they don’t have much visitors (photo buyers) just yet..

 
Comment by Sheri Coleman
2007-04-14 15:51:07

Thanks! I will review those links.

sheri

 
Comment by kyte
2007-04-17 05:53:59

I’m so pleased to have found your site, and thanks for the information you publish here. I’ve sent the link to this particular post to a couple of friends who would love to join the throngs of happy (and earning) photographers, as would I. I’ll be back!

 
Comment by Lannie
2007-04-21 00:31:14

Hi there,

Thanks for your very informative site. If we wish to submit pictures of buildings and landmarks, do we need formal permission from the building owners? For example, a picture of a famous landmark such as Edinburgh Castle or the Tower of London?

Cheers,
Lannie

 
Comment by Curt Woodcock
2007-04-23 06:38:23

Hi,

I just discovered the microstock industry recently and submitted 20 shots to Fotolia as a “test,” of which 10 were accepted. I listed the photos as being exclusively available only on Fotolia (not an exclusive buyout license) and am curious as to what the legalities are if I ever decided that I wanted to make any of those photos available on other sites. Can the original exclusive agreement with any of these companies ever be changed (in exchange for a lower commission) or once an exclusive availability is granted to them, is it etched in stone?

Thanks, and I appreciate your efforts in making this site available.

Curt

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-04-25 12:11:03

Lannie… I don’t think you’ll need a property release for a landmark. A property release must be obtained where identifiable property is included in an image that might sensibly lead to the identity of the owner of the property.

Curt… I think it’s much better if you ask your question to Fotolia… They should be able to explain it to you in detail.

 
Comment by Donna H
2007-04-28 02:58:36

Update to March 2-3 postings. I ended up with a Pentax K10D.
With the shake reduction in the camera, not the lens, I was able to afford the exact set-up I wanted (50-200 lens) - Plus I can use my old Pentax lenses…but not sure why I would. Fooled around with a few shots here at home, then yesterday went to a friends place with 2 new foals to entice me. HOLY COW - I got some great photos. Maybe I’m shell shocked because I’ve never used a 10+ megapixel camera but I’m thrilled. Signed up for a digital photography class at my local Community College to pick up some pointers. Thanks for this forum and web site, you fueled my interest into going forward into the digital age.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-04-28 10:17:37

Donna…I’m glad that you have found the perfect camera for you.. All the best on your new endeavour!

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-01 15:32:42

We had some problems with our database from Thursday - Monday ( 26/4 - 30/4). Comments posted during that time may have been lost. We apologize for any inconvenience.

 
Comment by John Wilde
2007-05-02 07:43:23

Hi,

Are you exclusive with any or all of these websites? Do you sell the same photos on different websites?

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-02 08:35:03

i’d like to thank you very sincerely for your very informative website, and very inspiring portfolio. i’ve recently decided to make a change of career and indulge my passion for photography. it is my ambition to be able to make a living selling my images online. it’s a real treat to find so much information in straightforward language. i’d like to know to what degree you use image editing software to finalise your images.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-03 14:19:03

John.. please read the FAQs above.

Carin… That’s really good.. This actually reminds me of the old saying: “Choose a job you love and. you will never have to work. a day in your life”… Regarding the post processing, I always keep it to a minimum level. I believe that’s what the agencies/photo buyers like.

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-03 20:09:47

hey, me again. i wanted to ask a quick technical question. at the moment i’m shooting with a canon pro1 powershot 8mp, which i inherited from my mum (she bought it, but couldn’t figure out how it works!). it’s a nice little camera, but i’m way more interested in a slr camera where i can change the lens. this is on a wishlist - there’s no official budget set aside at the moment - but i want to know what you would recommend as my first slr camera. i see you use a canon eos 5d, i’ve been looking at the canon eos 400d (10mp). Would you say the difference is worth saving a bit longer to get the big daddy? I’d also be looking at getting a fantastic lens with great depth of field.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-04 18:45:19

Carin… the EOS 400D should be good enough for shooting stocks. In fact, if you see my equipment list, I still have the old 6.3 MP Canon 300D (now discontinued) on the list.. More than 1/2 of my submitted photos were shot with this camera. For the lens, I’d start off with the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS which is a pretty good lens. Then for outdoor portrait, you can’t go wrong with Canon 70-200mm f/2.8. This lens will give you beautiful bokeh and is very sharp too.

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-09 04:56:35

…thanks for the advice.

 
Comment by Rafael
2007-05-10 15:45:53

I just want to thank you for your effort and candor to explain to us your experience with the different Stock sites, I will defenetly try them.
Congratulations on your photos they are all great.

 
Comment by John Wilde
2007-05-11 07:41:38

Hi,

Do you know any good free artifacts reduction software?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-12 00:41:54

Rafael.. Thank you for your kind words, much appreciated. :)

John… I’m currently using this software. Hope that helps.

 
Comment by BG
2007-05-13 12:58:18

This may be a stupid question, but here goes anyway: Would a Kodak EasyShare C310 provide photo quality acceptable to get a start selling photos online? If not, what would be your recommendations? Thank you!

 
Comment by bh
2007-05-16 16:23:08

I have a question regarding model and building release forms. Do you need a model release form if cannot see the person’s face? For example, in your gallery over at photblog you have a person in the water with a sack on their head with their back towards you. I also came across something called a building release form. When would you need this and how would you get the form signed? For example, you have several pictures of the skyline of cities with a number of buildings in them.

Thanks.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-16 17:49:28

BG… I’d recommend at least an entry level DSLR camera such as Canon EOS 400D or Nikon D40 to start off..

bh.. Nope you don’t, and here’s a note on property release: A property release must be obtained where identifiable property is included in an image that might sensibly lead to the identity of the owner of the property. Hope that helps.

 
Comment by Tami
2007-05-18 03:42:20

The software that you stated above that you use did you do the free download or did you buy it? It stated that it was free but with some limitations so I was wondering what limitations. Thanks So Much

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-18 07:42:53

Hey there. I’ve been registered on bigstockphoto, dreamstime. 123rf and fotolia for about 2 months now, and i am constantly amazed at how seemingly randomly each website accepts and rejects my submissions. As a result, when I have new images ready for upload, I upload them all to all the websites, and then it’s pretty interesting to see who wants what, though I’m not quite seeing a trend yet. My question to you, as a seasoned uploader and profiteer, would be the following: do you submit images exclusively with any of the above agencies, and do you determine individual pricing on your images, or do you submit randomly and use recommended pricings? Your images are incredible, and I’m just wondering whether your generated revenue is mostly down to mass downloads, or clever pricing and exclusivity control on your part.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-18 17:38:01

Tami.. Please visit this page to see the comparisons

 
Comment by Chris
2007-05-20 06:35:49

Thanks for your detailed info. I checked into this last year but didn’t do anything. Your series of earnings and other info has prompted me to look at it again much more seriously this time.

I just wanted to mention for some people who are struggling with the cost of getting a good camera and lens. I bought my Canon 20D and L lenses second hand. I’d say it’s better to have a good second hand camera/lens then a lesser capable but shiny new one. Last year’s model goes for an incredible discount in price and works just as good. When Canon comes out with the successor to the 5D - then the 5D will be THE camera to get second hand for sure.

Cheers.

 
Comment by eugene
2007-05-20 08:03:10

Hey, nice website and great tips

I see you have a lot of ads on the blog
Are you earning a lot from this blog?

great article and comments, keep it up

 
Comment by Robert Visintine
2007-05-20 09:00:00

This is a very interesting site. I intend to follow up with some of the URLs you mention as well as other links. Although I have several, my favorite camera at this time is the Cannon D20.

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-20 22:55:19

Carin.. I just upload the photos to all the websites and not worry about submit images exclusively with any of the agencies. I also use the recommended pricing…

Chris.. That’s really a good advice, thank you for that.

Eugene.. It’s enough to pay for the hosting every month.. ;)

Robert.. Did you mean the 20D?

 
Comment by Brett Simpson
2007-05-22 00:49:20

Great blog and website you have! A quick question, as I’m finally getting into selling stock - you mention that most of your shots are ‘landscapes’, but when I look at your photoblog the majority I see include people/faces/babies, etc…

So, I really wonder, do you know what the percentage is that you sell of Landscapes compared to shots with People in them?

It makes big difference for me, as I shoot mostly landscapes/nature, etc, Should I concentrate on getting people shots?

Keep up the excellent site and blogs… -Brett

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-22 22:00:40

Brett.. Most photos in my photoblog are personal works only. I don’t submit all of them to the agencies. The site is created as a visual playground for me for experimenting with new angle, photoshop techniques etc.

Like I said before, most photographers say that people photos always sell really good.. So, I guess you should start shooting people.. or, shoot everything and see which photos selling best. By doing that you’d know which subject you’re good at..

For the percentage, I think mine is around 60/40 for landscape..

 
Comment by temis
2007-05-23 07:03:05

I would like to ask if your sales were so good immediately or it took some time before starting to sell pictures. I mean did they buy your images immediately?

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-24 21:33:29

could you maybe tell me what your name is on dreamstime so i can check out your portfolio with them?

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-26 01:31:40

Ternis.. If you submit ‘OK’ photos to Shutterstock, you’ll see some sales right after your photos have been approved.

Carin..what’s your username on dt?..I’ll send you a sitemail.. ;)

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-05-27 01:09:17

my username is on dt is carix. i’m feeling a bit down on myself at the moment ’cause i’ve just had a look at the shutterstock website and all the pics on there are sooo good. they won’t have my pics (yet), and i can’t say i blame them. it seems just impossible to get anywhere near the clean, crisp, sharp images that are required by shutterstock and istockphoto, using my current camera (powershot). i’ve got constant problems with the focus, there’s constant noise, and by the time i’ve cleaned it up as much as i can with photoshop, any sharpness i had is gone. i’m really looking forward to getting my new camera and lenses, to give myself a real chance of making a go of this. i’ve decided to go for the canon eos 5d, and the lenses you recommended. a bit of money’s coming our way and i don’t want to have to upgrade again soon. anyway, hope you didn’t mind me having a bit of a sob on your blog… you could charge by the hour

 
Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-05-27 03:49:09

Carin.. I just posted a comment on one of your beautiful photos. Feel free to reply it to my e-mail

 
Comment by Kathryn
2007-06-05 14:42:23

Does anyone know the legal issues surrounding selling images of logos/company signs?

 
Comment by Daniella
2007-06-06 04:54:37

Kathryn.. your images will be rejected by the agencies if it contains company logos, trademarks, third-party images and brands.

 
Comment by Chris
2007-06-06 20:13:43

I see you have updated your May earnings. It seems to be pretty consistently above $2000 nowadays - which is excellent. I am very curious about a rough average earning per download figure. I have been doing various calculations and it seems like some sites pay so little per download. If you take your total downloads and divide the gross income into that to get a income per download figure - can you estimate roughly what that would be? I’d like to get a reasonable figure to plug into a spreadsheet to estimate how many photos vs. downloads volume vs. earnings.

Cheers.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-06-12 14:01:44

Hi Chris.. Usually I never bother to count the total download of my images across the agencies. I’m just happy with the extra money comes to my paypal account every month :P But, hey.. I might just start to do this at the end of this month..

 
Comment by viva Subscribed to comments via email
2007-07-24 03:54:47

Hello Chris,

Have you succeeded in making your excell file accurate? We all here would love to see it! If I can search something 4 you let me now and thank you for taking the time to read this request.

 
 
Comment by barb
2007-06-07 06:24:40

Wow, very informative article. I even read all the comments too to see if you addressed this question about model releases but it hasn’t come up, so my question is each agency seems to have their own personalized model release. Does this mean that you would have to know before you take the photo which agency you were going to submit the photo to and give the model the appropriate model release form? Would it not be possible to use a generic model release form in case you end up uploading the photo to several different agencies?

Thanks in advance for all your helfpul advice!

Comment by Emma
2007-06-08 04:45:43

This has been discussed on the article above under ‘Good Stock Photographs’ section.

 
 
Comment by TuxRacer69 Subscribed to comments via email
2007-06-08 22:47:25

I like this review and discovered also the graph from Alexa.
I tried to understand how site site compute its ranking information and discovered it uses the data sent by a toolbar your install in your web browser. Unfortunately I can not participate to this information tracking as I use Firefox and do not want to use IE.
You saw how all sites listed here drops in the number of hits (not really in percentage). Is that because more and more people use Firefox?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-06-12 13:47:53

It might be the case..or it might be just one of those slow months of the year.. you’ll never know.

I reckon google should provide a service like this as you said..more and more people are using firefox/IE with google toolbar rather than IE with alexa bar, so the data should be more accurate.

 
 
Comment by sam
2007-06-10 07:19:02

hi i’d just like to say what a great site this is! i was just wondering if anyone could help me in finding software which helps to reduce noise on the picture that i take. anyone know of any?

thanks

sam

Comment by Chris
2007-06-11 01:54:45

Sam,

There are sevreral well known ones. I’ve used Neat Image and it works well. Another one is Noise Ninja. For more just google “photo noise reduction”. I think Neat Image still has a free version.

Chris :)

 
Comment by Emma
2007-06-11 02:03:03

I’m currently using Noiseware to help me reduce noise on my images. Got it from this link:

http://www.dphotojournal.com/download-free-noiseware-community-edition-25/

 
 
Comment by sam
2007-06-12 04:00:04

thank you for your help! just another quick one what ftp software would you recommend to upload photos?

Sam

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-06-12 13:44:42

Sam, I’ve been using CuteFTP for ages.. you can get the home version for $40. If you’re looking for a free FTP client, try Filezilla..

 
Comment by Chris
2007-06-13 19:23:12

You might want to look at SmartFTP. It’s pretty good. It is free for personal/educational use. It’s quite complete as well.
Chris :)

 
 
Comment by sam
2007-06-14 02:54:38

wow! thank you all you’ve all been so helpful! just wondering if any1 else has found their pictures harder to get accepted by shutterstock than others such as fotolia? is their a reason for this???

~Sam~

Comment by Andrew
2007-06-14 21:47:54

Sam.. I think it’s just because SS currently has close to 2 million images and they add around 25000 photos/week. I guess they just don’t want to waste their hard disk space on ‘not-so-good’ stock photographs

Cheers,
Andrew

 
 
Comment by Alexander Park Subscribed to comments via email
2007-06-16 19:32:34

I have a little bit different side of questions.
All those companies who buy and sell photos have Business Model Patent?
Photographers upload their photos and website companies sell and pay to photographers- this might be a good business model itself. Why nobody registered a patent?
I saw one business model patent exactly the way Shutterstock or other companies are doing in South Korea.
I am also thinking about opening a website for photo agency, that’s why I am interested.
Thank you.

 
Comment by Joao
2007-06-24 07:53:16

Hello

Thanks for this site, it has helped me much.

I´d like to add my input to “BG” comment respecting to his camera the Easyshare C310.

I also hope that others that may not have DSRL cameras may find this post encouraging.

I have become a member at bigstockphoto, and have uploaded some photos there that were done with a Kodak Easyshare C300, and they were accepted thanks to God. However, I edited these photos in a image editor to improve color, saturation, warm, and noise reduction, basically.

I also wanted to give this link, http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/150-vs-5000-dollar-camera.htm, it´s a man that compares his 3000 dollar (though his equipment costs 5000) camera (Canon 5D) against a 150 dollar Canon A350. See the results for yourself. :)

Also, for beginners (like me) you may want to check out HDR photography, which stands for “High Dynamic Range” and you can learn more at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging, this can greatly improve your images no matter if you own a cheap camera or a high end one. I would earnestly recomend you to try it out, as it can make your pictures to stand out, specially landscapes. See more examples of this technique by going here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/valpopando/457816840/

Bye.

 
Comment by Mike Subscribed to comments via email
2007-06-27 06:39:36

Hello,

I recently split the cost of a Sony Alpha A100 with my mom, and I’ve been looking into this a bit. However, I am under 18 so I dont know how these companies will handle that. SS didnt say anything about age at all. So, Im wondering what you recommend? Should I sign up with my info, or just use my moms? Thanks.

-Mike

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-06-27 12:36:55

Mike.. I think you should shoot them an email before you sign up asking about this matter. They should be able to give you a clear explanation. All the best!

 
 
Comment by fred lucato
2007-06-29 02:25:47

I have 700 pic in 123rf and 600 in fotolia from May. I mean approved pictures. I haven’t seen such a good earnings as you but just some small money. Is it because your pictures are really stunning or it takes sometime before you see good results?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-06-29 09:59:28

Fred.. feel free to browse my portfolio to see what kind of pictures I’ve submitted to the agencies. Usually I can see immediate good result after my photos have been approved in ss but not in other agencies.

 
 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-07-12 23:50:25

hello! do you have any time saving tips for uploading/keywording my files? I seem to spend ages and ages going through the various websites’ (I’m on 7 now) uploading pages. Does there exist a kind of connection or something whereby I can upload my files to the various agencies at a click of a button? :) thanks!

Comment by Andrew
2007-07-13 11:13:25

I do my keywording in photoshop. Usually I make a keyword template for landscape photos, people photos, etc so I don’t have to type everything all over again for each file. Finsih with that I upload all my files with FTP program to each agency (except for IS). It’s pretty easy, you just have to drag all files on the left window to the right window like in windows explorer and let the program works while I sleep at night. Then it comes to the most daunting task which is setting categories to each photo in each agency which takes a little bit of time. Hope it helps.

 
 
Comment by Tricia Subscribed to comments via email
2007-07-30 02:03:13

What is the best iso setting for landscapes, macro shots, & interiors of homes?
Thanks

Comment by Igor Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-02 02:18:22

Tricia,

To my mind the best iso is always the lowest possible iso available
for you in particular situation. As far as I know the higher iso the higher
the noise! However, the shutter speed also matters. The longer the
exposition the higher the noise! Taking all this into account I would
use tripod, set iso = 100 (the lowest on my Nikon D80) set the
appropriate shutter speed, make a picture and see how it looks like.
I would also try the same procedure with iso = 200, 300 and probably
higher to compare the results. Only after these tests you can tell which
iso/shutter speed is better for your case.

Hope this helps,
Igor.

 
 
Comment by Ant Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-02 07:01:32

Hi ya, just trying to click through to your blog. Am very interested to see some of your sample photos.

Am I doing something wrong?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-08-02 08:37:52

Hi Ant, the link has been fixed.. thank you for your notice.. ;)

Comment by Ant Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-02 21:16:02

No trouble… that’s a great folio you got there - I can see why you’re earning such good money. Have you had formal training? It looks like the work of a seasoned pro…

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-08-06 16:21:16

thank you for your kind words..and no, I still haven’t got the time to do a formal photography course :( Been busy my day job, some websites, and lately with my 4 months old baby boy.. :D

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Zander
2007-08-11 11:27:41

Hi,
I was wondering if it is safe to enter all of the passport information and the credit card numbers. Why do they do that? What sites are safe?
Thanks.

Comment by Dave
2007-08-14 20:41:32

They might use it to avoid fraud. I think because many ‘photographers’ submit others people works to the agency. Just my 2 cents.

 
 
Comment by T. Cartwright
2007-08-18 12:19:47

Hi All, I’ve been taking photos of landscape for ages and now I want to expand my portfolio by taking people photos. The thing is that I’m having problem directing people to get the pose that I want. Has anyone got any tips on directing the models? Where do you get your posing ideas?

Many thanks…

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-08-19 17:21:55

You can download the model posing guides here: http://www.dphotojournal.com/free-model-posing-guides-tips/

 
 
Comment by Ian Harling Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-18 22:20:09

Hi. I’m a photographer and photograph collector. I have a very large collection of B+W shots gong back to the early days of photography, mostly non-portrait or unusual, with a lot of newspaper shots from the 40’s and before. Firstly, is there any demand for B+W early photo’s? Secondly, I assume that agency shots taken for newspapers have lapsed from copyright after 50 years, is this the case?

Thanks for your help, great site,

IH

Comment by Matt
2007-08-23 21:17:10

I don’t think there’s a lot of demand for B&W photos from the 40’s and before, but hey..you’ll never know until you try to submit them. My suggestion is you might want to ask the photo editor from each of the agency above before wasting any time submitting your photos.

 
 
Comment by Eric
2007-08-19 10:37:34

What a wonderful forum - it’s been fun to read through the posts over the past 2 years and see the development of an online community! Now for my questions - I’m very interested in aerial stock photography and I have two questions: 1. Any idea if there is much of a demand for this? 2. Any suggestions on DSLR’s (and/or lenses) that would work best in the ‘bumpy’ environment of an airplane cockpit? Thanks so much for any suggestions!

Comment by William
2007-08-23 21:24:57

Hi Eric, I’ve been submitting my photos for a year now..and let me try to answer your question;

1. I think there’s always a demand for aerial photography. I don’t think they have many photos from that niche..
2. I’m not really sure about this since I’ve never been taking photos from the cockpit.. But I think all the latest DSLRs from Canon should be fine since they have less noise so you can use high ISO to get eliminate any motion blur..

 
 
Comment by noirin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-22 21:52:13

hi, one question! Say you have 700 images on one site, im assuming the site does not accept 700 images straight off, so how long does it take to get to that level of images available for sale?

thanks.

Comment by William
2007-08-23 21:28:31

I think you can upload as many photos as you want to the agencies like shutterstock, dreamstime & fotolia once you’ve been accepted.

Comment by Noirin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-06 21:19:40

Cool thanks. Must get to work on getting my images online for sale. :)

 
 
 
Comment by Rocket Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-28 12:12:14

Hi I have a question, will a Rebel XT 8 MP be good enough for taking quality and acceptable stock photos?

Comment by Mark
2007-08-28 23:16:07

I think you should be fine since almost 2/3 of my photos submitted to the agencies were shot with the 6MP Canon EOS 300D, and they’re selling pretty good.

 
 
Comment by Eric
2007-08-29 11:03:08

I’d like some advice on a purchasing a lens. I’m planning on shooting aerial stock photos (air to ground or landscapes, not air to air) and will typically be flying about 1000 feet over my subject (in a rather bumpy environment). I’ve decided to purchase a Canon Rebel XTi, but I’m not sure what lens to purchase for it. What should I look for in a lens?

I believe that the advantage of a zoom lens is the convenience and utility of not having to switch lenses between wide angle and telephoto shots, while prime lenses tend to provide a sharper photo - is that true?. If I did decide to go with a prime lens, what should I look for if I’ll be 1000 ft from the ground? In general, is it better to go with a manufacturer’s lens (in this case, a Canon), or will any SLR lens do (I can get a Tamron 28-33mm Image stabilized lens for $599, though that’s about $200 more than I’d like to spend). Does anyone have any suggestions or advice about a good lens for my situation?

Thanks in advance!

Comment by Mark
2007-08-31 11:13:46

So your budget is around $300, right? I’d recommend the Canon 28-135mm IS. Amazon currently has a pretty good deal on the lens ($305.04) and the lens users rate it 4.5/5. Beside you’d have the Image Stabilizer to eliminate motion blur when you shoot in a rather bumpu environment.

Hope that helps.

 
 
Comment by Micheal
2007-08-29 20:46:08

Excellent article. I started uploading photos 2 weeks ago and now have 50 across 5 of the six sites mentioned above. So far three sales. Thanks for the inspiration

Comment by Mark
2007-08-31 11:22:20

Back to my first upload days around a year ago..My only problem was I couldn’t stop looking at the stats. This thing can be so addictive!
I hope you don’t have the same problem as mine.. :P

 
 
Comment by Scott
2007-09-04 01:15:56

Hi, just wondering if you upload any photos since august’06, since it looks like your earning has been around 2K since that month and not moving up.. I remember reading this article for the first time around January 2006… and after 1.5 years in this business, I am now earning around 3k/month with approx 2000 photos for sale online. Well, it’s not that much compared to the other big guns in microstock industry..but, Hey! I’m really proud of it.. ;) ..So thank you for the inspiration!!!

Regards,
Scott

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-06 09:53:41

My last upload was Jan’07 …uploaded around 80 photos that time, and that was it. Been busy with other projects and my 5 months old baby boy lately…
Well done with your earnings! It looks like you know how to take photo that sells. Keep shooting and uploading and before you know it you’ll be one of the big guns in microstock industry.. ;)

 
 
Comment by Ricky Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-05 03:14:40

Hi! I’m very curious about this business, and I’m wondering if there are good opportunities to earn quite money for newbies too(like myself) or mainly for the professionals who started one or two years ago.
Thanks…and sorry for my English (I’m Italian).
Ciao!
Ricky

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-06 10:03:33

Ricky, please see FAQ no. 1 above.. Those big names in the industry were newbies too when they uploaded their first photos. All the best!

 
 
Comment by Julie Eydman
2007-09-06 05:22:48

Hi,

These are interesting stats - it unveils the mystery about how much you can realistically make on microstock sites. If anyone is interested, ShutterPoint.com is currently offering a free “Guide to Marketable Photography” which comprehensively explains how to achieve marketable images and also showcases hundreds of top-selling images.

Julie.

 
Comment by Ken Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-07 15:28:23

Hi, may I know, as for Paypal, is it necessary to use Paypal Premier or Business Account to receive the payments? Or you just the Paypal Personal Account will do?
Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-07 17:35:52

Ken, you don’t need to use the Paypal Premier or Business Account to receive the payments.. Your Paypal Personal Account will do just fine..

 
 
Comment by Allie
2007-09-11 16:33:20

Wonderful information! Thank you sooooo much for being so open.

Just wondering, I have a Nikon E5000 and am wondering if it’s good for taking stock photos??? It seems to have noise sometimes, but I haven’t figured out yet if that’s some setting I’ve not yet found out about (it has lots and lots of settings). I’ve been wanting to get a D80 so can use the lenses I have already (for Nikon 35mm film).

The photos in your blog are wonderful to say the least. We all strive to be that good!

Thanks for your comment back :)
Keep up the good work!…

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-14 01:19:17

Allie, thank you for your kind words.. :)

I’d strongly recommend you to get a DSLR camera (eg. D40) and a good piece of glass if you want to take this seriously. With more photographers submitting their best photos every day, it’s just getting harder and harder to get your photos accepted by the photo editors from each site. All the best!

 
 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-11 17:19:08

Hey, I still haven’t bought my new camera because i’m still hunting for the perfect option. At the moment my heart is set on the Nikon D200, which I want to get with the 70-200mm f2.8G ED-IF AF Zoom Nikkor lens. I am looking for a Nikkor lens which is compatible with your earlier suggestion of the 17-85mm f4-5.6 Canon lens. I’ve found a 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 version with Nikkor. I’m looking for a high performance lens which has no difficulty freezing motion. Do you know how these two compare? Bye!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-14 01:30:29

With the release of D300, the price of Nikon D200 should fall pretty soon, and that’s when you should get one.. I’m not familiar with nikkor glasses, but if you want to freeze motion, it’s better if you get a fast lens (f/2.8 or faster). Therefore, you can always keep your ISO setting down and avoid digital noise.

 
 
Comment by Mrs McDreamy Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-14 12:14:45

Hi there

Great website :)

just wondering, some of the websites requires large size of photos to be accepted.For example in tiff format, and the size can be up to 50MB for each photo. My DSLR is only 8MP so what do you do? IS there a software when you can convert photos to tiff?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-16 15:37:28

You can use Genuine Fractals. I think the software is also recommended by Alamy.

cheers.

 
 
Comment by Allie
2007-09-14 13:01:25

Thanks for your reply–I was thinking of a Nikon D40 before because of the price, but I already have two Promaster autofocus lenses plus filters and teleconverter for them. Someone told me they won’t work on the D40. Is this true or do I still need a D80??

Thanks again for your comments. I learned a lot from your site–hope you keep it up!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-16 18:58:49

Allie, I shoot with Canon camera and lenses, so I’m not really sure how to answer your question.. But you can join Nikon forum at http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi I think The forum members there should be able to help you..

 
 
Comment by Joshua Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-16 21:41:12

Hey love the site,
Im thinking about getting the Canon Rebel XTI, and i noticed earlyer you said that you upgraded from this camera i beleave and have had higher acceptance rates of your photos. Im pretty much getting the camera for school but figured hey why not make money with the photos i’ll be taking for class lol :) then again i love to take pictures. So do you recomend this paticular camera based on its Noise Factor?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-18 02:10:12

Joshua, that’s a perfect camera to start with… It’s even better that the Canon’s Digital Rebel XT and XTi DSLRs are now available at new low prices. I’d recommend the 17-85mm IS lens to go with this camera.

 
 
Comment by Azhar
2007-09-16 22:56:32

I would appreciate if you could help me out here…
Firstly great article. When you start selling online, when someone licenses your photo, what if they start reproducing it and selling it? How can you prevent it? And won’t you be just giving it away for them to exploit?
Also, I am 17 and run India’s most popular photoblog at http://www.thedailysunrise.com, I have a very strong portfolio of over 100+ potential selling images (I have shot over a 1000 like you but I doubt all will sell), I am just about to apply to my universities for my BFA, so I can’t risk any of my photos getting into the wrong hands. I need to start earning to somehow fun a nice laptop for myself =D

Also (sorry, this is the 3rd also =D) so you sell prints? Like any luck with Imagekind?

Sorry to ask so many questions, but I hope you find the time to answer them.

Again, a great guiding article for all of us amateurs out there.
Thanks again!
Azhar

 
Comment by carin Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-20 02:33:19

just had another look through your awesome portfolio on your photoblog. My especial favorites are ‘pray’ and ‘heaven on earth’. how do you achieve that dreamlike, softened quality, and keep the focus clear? i’ve been playing with different filters on photoshop, and blurs, diffuse glow etc., but i can’t quite seem to get that soft, even feel and keep it sharp. would appreciate a tip from the top.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-23 11:24:02

hey Carin, can you give me the links?

cheers

 
 
Comment by ckalt Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-20 23:45:52

hi all
after reading this article and others similar to it i decided to give selling photos online a go, I started a week ago and had my first sale today.

If anyone is interested im keeping a blog of how it goes

comments and suggestions welcome!

 
Comment by Teresa Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-23 00:55:17

Is shutterstock still accepting photographers? I signed up for an account this morning and I can’t navigate around the website at all. I wanted to submit the initial 10 photos for approval. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Teresa

Comment by Ray
2007-09-23 11:33:09

I can navigate the site all right with no problem.

However, most website do their site maintenance on the weekend when they have less traffic (visitors). In doing so they might have to turn off some of the site features. So this might be the case why you’re having problem accessing their site.

 
 
Comment by Courtney
2007-09-25 09:00:12

Hi,

I have recently started in the microstock game and was wondering about earnings consistency.
I notice you mentioned your last upload was Jan 07, and it looks ike your earnings have just started to drop off.
Have you found that your earnings usually drop off if you stop uploading for a while, or do they stay fairly consistent?

Thanks,
Courtney

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-09-27 22:21:00

Yup, when you stop uploading pictures, you’ll find your earning dropping off gradually since most photo buyers only buy the latest good photos submitted and there are many2 great photographers submitting their images everyday. So keep your portfolio fresh with great images. Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Sare
2007-09-25 13:46:06

Do you have to sign away copyright on all pics sold online??

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 14:44:37

You must own the copyright of your works..but, don’t worry to add a copyright watermark to your photos.

 
 
Comment by emi Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-27 21:16:29

Hi Paul,

What are the standard resolution and ASA recommended for selling online?

I used to photograph alot before the digital revolution and am interested to start again, since I am getting a camera tomorrow.

Please advice. thank you.

Emi

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 14:48:36

Emi.. I think the minimum resolution is like 3072 x 2048 pixel (6 MP) ..the recommended ASA if you’re planning to shoot with a digital camera is always 100 or lower to avoid digital noise.

 
 
Comment by Courtney
2007-09-28 05:43:52

Thanks for your advice, much appreciated.

Courtney

 
Comment by Destiny
2007-09-29 04:53:30

I see you manage to sell with BigStock and the other agencies simultaneously. Do you offer any extended licenses that might require you to pull a photo for a client exclusively? If so, how do you manage it with the photo being listed somewhere like BigStock that says you have no rights to pull the photo for at least 90 days?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 14:50:43

I never sell my photos exclusively to a client..

 
 
Comment by Anne
2007-09-30 23:40:06

Hi dphotojournal,
Congratulations for your great earning. I’m very surprised reading that your 2k income boosted after your vacation to Indonesia. I live in a tropical country and getting crazy shooting pictures everyday. However, the images is not good enough I think to be uploaded. I’m using Canon PowerShot A460 5MP. Do you think it’s not the camera weakness, but the photographer, that’s me!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 14:54:42

Yeah..most photos were taken at the beautiful hotels swimming pool and beaches in Bali.. I must say it’s really a beautiful place. Great for your travel stock photos theme

 
 
Comment by CRISTIAN GALLI Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-03 08:04:15

Hi,thanks for this important information…..EXIST SOME STOCK FOTO COMPANY THAT CAN ACCEPT MY 1600X 1200 size foto’s?
i shot this fotos with a powershot por1 canon,but i don’t use 8 mpx …i make all the foto with the size 1600×1200.
sorry for my english,….. thanks cristian

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 14:58:11

Hi Christian, I’m not really sure.. You might want to ask the agency regarding your question since each agency have its own rule regarding the minimum image resolution that can be submitted.

 
 
Comment by Izo Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-03 10:28:05

I just wonder : how many time did you spend entering the info for every picture ? Do you have a secret method ? I spent a few hours trying to enter every practical and useful info on every picture and it’s hard to manage !

Izo

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-04 15:09:32

Photoshop CS2 has the batch keywording / batch titling feature to make your life easier. I think there is also an EXIF/IPTC plugin in for Irfanview which may work with batches. It’s free, so not harm in exploring the possibilities.

 
 
Comment by Frances
2007-10-03 15:14:23

yes i had a question what size photos should i take to start?

 
Comment by Mike
2007-10-05 15:08:12

As for model release compensation, how much would you normally give to an indivdual? What about for photos taken overseas during maybe a crises or something (child poverty,etc.)?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-10 11:43:22

Try to you visit model sites like modelmayhem.com, you can get a photoshoot with an amateur model who’s trying to break into the business for “free”.

In most cases, they usually ask for TFP (Time for Pictures) or TFCD (Time for CD). So you give them prints or a cd with pictures, in exchange for the time they spent modeling for you.

Hope that helps.

 
 
Comment by emi Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-05 20:43:55

thanks for the answers.

My photos are already 10mpixel, is it still neccesary to interpolate it?
I tried doing it on my photoshop, and my image did not expand to 48mb but still stayed at 1mb. what did i do wrong?

With a 10mpixel size image, i doubt interpolating is still necessary? i am confused.

thanks again!

Comment by Ray
2007-10-09 20:34:29

Emi, I don’t think you’ll need to interpolate your images. Unless if you’re submitting for Alamy

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-10 11:47:05

Ray is right. In fact, you’re NOT allowed to interpolate your photos when submitting your photos to some of the sites mentioned in this article.

 
 
 
Comment by Alexandra
2007-10-09 18:13:24

Hi there! Thanks so much for your information, I actually spent a night reading it all and now it feels like I’ve been through a kind of a University course.:)))
I still have 3 questions though -
1) I live and work in Russia, paypall doesn’t exist here :(((( As for checks, they will take a long time to get here( in case they do get here). Have you ever heard of an alternative to paypall?
2)You said you try not to retouch your photoes. Do you mean you don’t change the “intense” of the colours as well( like making blue more blue and so on)?And if you do,how do the agencies react on that?
3)What about a digitally made b&w photo? Have you ever sold one or heard of those being sold?( the same about sepia)

Thanks in advance for any replies! And good luck and a kind “muse”:) to you all!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-10 12:02:27

Hi Alexandra, great to hear that the article can be very useful to some people..

1. I think some of them also have Moneybookers as option. But, I’m not sure whether it’s available in Russia. The best thing is asking this question in their forum. Most of them have a very active forum, and I’m sure there are many Russian photographers who are willing to help you.

2. Increasing contrast or add more saturation to your photos will be just fine. Just don’t apply photoshop filters such as artistic effects, sketch etc to your photos.

3. In many cases people who download your photos are designers who know how to do that easily in photoshop. Converting your photos to BW is just limiting yourself to other potential buyers who want to use the color version of your photos. So, I won’t bother converting them to BW. I better use my time to do keywording or to take more photos..

 
Comment by Angarato Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-31 02:55:59

Alexandra,

You also can find an awesome Russian resource
at: http://www.microstock.ru
To my mind this is an excellent Russian forum
where you will find a lot of info you are
interested in in particular.

Enjoy!

Regards,
Angarato.

 
 
Comment by nels
2007-10-19 02:08:24

Great and Informative postings,
I was wondering how you format the IPTC tags? I’ve been playing around with them and cannot get the tags to register on any of the sites. IE, I’ve tried things like “keywords; cute, baby, etc” but have had no luck. Any help would be great.
Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-19 20:20:42

Nels, I did my IPTC in Photoshop (File > File Info) and never have had any problem. You might want to ask them about why their system can not read your embedded IPTC..

 
 
Comment by Pics
2007-10-20 11:01:30

It is amazing how the internet has opened the doors of the photography marketplace for so many people. It is nice to see people being rewarded for their passions.

 
Comment by Olu
2007-10-20 19:37:25

This article is great. Thank you for all of the useful information. I have one question though, what’s the difference between selling your photos royalty free and an exclusive buyout license? Does the exclusive buyout license refer to the fact that you’re tying yourself to that one stock photo company only?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-23 09:54:02

Olu… Yup, you’re right!

 
 
Comment by Ole A Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-23 03:38:19

This is an excellent article, but i wonder if you have some advices for a first-timer of sellng pictures? Is there a place that is better for an amateur?

Best regards Ole

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-23 10:08:17

Ole, I honestly think that microstok site is the best place for amateur photographers who want to try to sell their photos. Each site has an active community where you can learn a lot from other photographers. I’ve seen many amateur photographers grow, and when I’m comparing their first uploaded photos to their current uploads..sometimes I just can’t believe that they were shot by the same photographer. It shows so much how these photographers skills has just got so much better.

 
 
Comment by affzan Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-23 05:07:49

Hiya

Looking at your photoblog, I think I know you from somewhere, photomalaysia forum perhaps?

Anyway, just like to congratulate you on your earnings. I’ve always dreamed of getting those kind of income every month, but so far not very impressive.

A quick question, how long does it take for you to start earning steadily from those microstock sites? I started a year ago but very rarely uploading until recently, hence my portfolio contains only 20 photos or so. I’m getting 1 or 2 downloads per week at the moment. What was the number like when you first started this microstock business?

Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-23 10:47:14

Affzan.. I broke $100/month when I’ve got around more than 100 photos on each site.. But I think it all depends on the quality of your photos rather than quantity. I know a photographer who has around 1500 photos but has less earning than me.. So, make sure you you know how to take high quality stock photos and upload only your best works..

Good luck!

Comment by affzan Subscribed to comments via email
2007-10-26 00:24:30

Thank you for your advice

I’m really happy with Shutterstock. I’ve just uploaded my first batch of 10 photos and 8 were accepted two days ago.

To my surprise, I’ve already generated $5.50 just from that 8 photos over the period of 2 days. This is much better than what I get with the same photos in fotolia and other microstock agencies. But of course, fotolia is much more forgiving than shutterstock in terms of rejecting photos

I can’t wait to upload more. At the moment I’m planning to set up my DIY home studio, using floodlight, boxes, white cloth and papers etc. Might buy some umbrella and softboxes from ebay as well. This is for my children’s portrait shots. I was thinking of having white muslin as the background, 1 strobe with umbrella and another with softbox. I don’t know whether that gives me the look I want but maybe that’s a start

Do you have any suggestion on very cheap studio lighting equipment?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-10-28 23:27:51

Affzan, That’s pretty good!
Get used to see your earnings increase immediately after uploading new photos on Shutterstock from time to time.

You can buy cheap studio lighting equipment made in china on ebay. I bought mine from a local shop in Melb for about US$1000. I think it’s a bargain since that includes 3 lights with 3 softboxes, and other accessories (light-stand, barn door, honeycomb, etc), 4 different background colors, background stand, and a flash trigger.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by CD
2007-10-31 03:00:57

My husband is a wonderful amateur photographer
(I am not so bad either) who is involved with several local camera clubs where he is winning recognition and awards. We recently put together a website to sell his photos (no one even knows it’s there yet); but would also like to get into stock phototgraphy sales as we plan to retire within the next 5 years and would love to do this full time. If we sign up with some of these stock agencies can we still sell the photos on our our website? Do our photos need to be officially copyrighted? What stock agencies do you recommend as the best for sales of landscapes, flowers, animals and lighthouses? These are his specialties. Thanks!!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-11-14 08:26:07

Yes you can, as long as you are not being exclusive to any agency and you’re selling all your photos as Royalty Free.

 
 
Comment by john Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-02 01:19:41

SO is shutterstock free?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-11-14 08:26:39

Yes, it’s absolutely free.

Comment by john Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-24 02:48:06

n do u have to send in like a id card or passport?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-11-28 08:27:35

When I applied to SS 2 years ago, yes I did have to send in a copy of my passport. But the rule might have changed now..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by john Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-29 07:24:38

Ok thx :)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Maurice
2007-11-07 03:08:06

Hi there, thanks for the good info.
I have a question though,
When do you become bronze to diamond with istockphoto?

I was wondering how you get higher up. Lets say you have uploaded and sold some Royalty Free photos and there is one very good photo that just as well could be a Rights-Managed photo on gettyimages. How do you get there. Do you get invited or anything ? And the image you submitted, you can’t suddenly decide to go ask 300 dollars for it once its been Royalty free. am i right ?

Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-11-14 08:33:00

You’ll be a diamond when you have 25,000-200,000 downloads.

I’m not really sure with your next question since I still have around 1000 downloads to go for my diamond. You might want to check out the IS forum to get the answer.

 
 
Comment by Chris
2007-11-15 22:56:14

Hi,

Fantastic article - inspired me to buy a DSLR!

I`ve been looking at the 400D/40D but I read somewhere that the EF-S lenses (such as the 17-85mm IS lens you mentioned earlier), wont work with later models, such as the 5D (which you have). Is this the case? Did you have to sell the EF-S lens when you upgraded?
Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-11-23 07:10:34

The reason why the EFs lens won’t work with 5D is because 5D is a full-frame digital camera whilst the EFs lenses only work on Canon digital cameras with 1.6x crop factor. like 300D, 40D, 400D, & 30D.

When I upgraded to 5D, the only EFs I had was the kit lens (EFs 18-55mm) so I didn’t bother to sell it. Besides, I have a plan to use my 300D as an infrared DSLR.

Hope that helps.

 
 
Comment by JH
2007-11-25 00:31:37

There’s a site called PhotoFront (link here) that lets you sell unlimited photos and/or stock photos with no commissions. Sounds promising.

 
Comment by scott
2007-11-30 15:36:30

Hi i’m new at this but have a Megxon X33 camera how
do you download your photos from your camera to your computer?

Thanks!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-12-13 23:11:50

I’m not sure about your camera, but generally all digital cameras come with a software where you can download your photos from your camera to your computer..

 
 
Comment by Richard
2007-12-02 14:05:54

You should have mentioned something about fair trade stock photography. Why would you let someone pay you a dollar for a photo that they are going to use to make thousands of dollars? Why would you spend thousands of dollars on equipment and transportation–to say nothing of the time and effort to gain the necessary skills–only to sell your photo at slave wages? These microstock sites are undercutting professional photography by enticing people who are so ignorant about the trade that they don’t even know or care what a good photo is worth.

 
Comment by Lenner
2007-12-03 07:14:45

Thanks for all the info! You mentioned that you used budget sigma lenses with your canon 350D in you “early” days. What sigma lens would you recommend with the 350D? What sigma’s did you use? Let me put it this way. What budget sigma’s would your recommend that will do the job. Do all sigma lenses fit the 350d? I would love to get cannon lenses, but I just don’t have the cash. What do you think about the Sony alpha? Thanks. Take care.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-12-13 23:52:58

I used sigma 12-24mm for wide, 70-300mm APO II for longer shots and 24-70 for portraits..

Hope that helps.

 
 
Comment by Max Subscribed to comments via email
2007-12-04 04:51:05

Hi,
thanks for the great site. Could you tell me what size each image should be in order to be accepted. Is tiff ok?
Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2007-12-13 23:59:17

I think the minimum is still 6 MP. You might want to check the image submission requirements on each agency for more detail.

 
 
Comment by Phase4Photography
2007-12-20 13:26:03

Thanks for the great information! I check back frequently to see how you are doing and you always have informative posts. It’s great to see how fellow microstockers are doing!

 
Comment by erwin
2008-01-10 14:34:35

Thank’s for the tips,

But I’v something else to say:
Be careful if you send to the subscription agenceis model, consider this:

1. subscription sales are much more destructive for the business as a whole, than microstock in general. Subscriptions enable customers to build large image archives that reduces the need to download photos in the future and thus our (photographer) profit potential.

2. average subscribers only use about 15 - 30% of the full potential of their membership. This means that most pictures in a subscription sell at a 5-6USD price-point in average, giving us about 25 cents in commission. A bottom-line commission of about 5 percent. Even if I was totally wrong and every subscriber actually downloaded the double of what I have heard, the commission would still only be 10%.

3. Same price at all size.

Downsize your image before send to the subscription model agencies.
this link is interesting
http://www.microstockgroup.com/index.php?topic=3278.0

for photographer future, there is pay per photo and 70% share agency out there…
FeaturePics.com is one of them

 
Comment by erwin
2008-01-11 17:29:09

here is another reason why photographers hate subscription agencies (shutterstock, dreamstime, 123rf):

4. Deep Discounts
First, in the business world, deep discounts are normally given to the best customers. Giving a deep discount (up to 35% off or more from the normal price) is understandable. But subscriptions go much, much deeper than that.

The approximate cost and royalty for a maximum size image is as follows at the top sites:

IS: $20 ($4)
DT: $8 ($4)
SXP: $10 ($5)
FT: $5 ($1.50)

So an artist will receive between $1.50 and $5 for a maximum size image from the largest sites.

If a customer buys lots of images, then a discount should be given. Giving discounts to large customers is good business. But most sites already have discounts for purchasing large token packages. For example, on IS if you buy 1500 credits, then you will receive a 34% discount. On DT, if you buy over 150 credits, then you will receive a 25% discount. On SXP, if you buy 500 credits, then you will receive a 20% discount.

But subscriptions go above and beyond these deep discounts. Almost to the point of giving away our images.

For example, on DT, a submitter receives 0.30 for a subscription. That is a 93% discount from the normal royalty (of $8 for a maximum size image with over 100 sales). On SXP, a submitter receives 0.30 for a subscription. That is a 97% discount from the normal royalty (of $10 for an XXL image).

5. Macro Buyers
Second, the buyers that are purchasing subscription packages are normally the large agencies that need lots and lots of images. These are the agencies that used to purchase macrostock images for $100s (if not $1,000s) of dollars apiece. These are the customers that could actually afford to purchase images individually (if needed). According to the financial news, this is a multi-billion dollar industry. They have deep pockets. But yet, they now want to offer them even deeper discounts (over 95% off) on images that are already cheap. It makes no sense

we are free to choose which better for us…

 
Comment by Pete Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-01 04:11:06

Great site, thanks for all the info.
Are there any stock sites that accept editorial images?
I have several images of buildings and sports events that i cannot get release forms for and wonder if i can use them in this way.
thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-02-08 23:22:54

You might want to try shutterstock & alamy to sell your editorial photographs

Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Jane
2008-02-24 10:34:29

I have three questions about selling photos online via micro stock photography sites such as Shutterstock, Fotolia, etc.

1) Do you have to pay sales tax on commissions earned from photo sales?

2)If a photo is sold to someone in another country do you have to declare the item and value on customs forms?

3)Do you recommend opening a business checking account for photo earnings in PayPal to be transferred to?

Comment by Timothy
2008-02-24 17:55:40

1. Yes, if you live in the USA. You’ll need to confirm this to the agency since you might need to fill up a tax form.
2. No
3. No, a personal paypal account should be fine.

Comment by Jane
2008-02-25 07:29:32

Thank you for your response, Timothy.

This article and the following comments have been a HUGE help for me as I have just started researching selling photos online.

Does anyone have a recommendation for the best pixel size for uploading photos to balance quality and saleability with speed of upload?
Thanks in advance!

 
 
 
Comment by Jane
2008-03-06 00:24:11

I just had my first three sample photos rejected by iStockphoto.com due to “artifacting when viewed at full size.” The photos were 4.9 MP, the quality setting on my camera was high and the HP Image Zone program I used was set on the lowest compression/highest quality setting for saving JPEG images.
1) Do you have any other recommendations to avoid compression artifacting?
2) I have a Panasonic DMC-FZ20 camera. Do I need a higher quality camera or different photo editing program?

Comment by Dejan Subscribed to comments via email
2008-03-07 06:45:43

Try to use TIFF mode. TIFF is “looseless” format with no artifacting.

JPEG is format with compressions and quality losing with EVERY saving during the image processing. More savings = more artifacts and the result is… rejection.

Process image in TIFF format and at the end of the process convert it in JPEG with max quality. And keep TIFF images for further modifications (eventually)!

Photo editing software: The best is Photoshop, but fairly expensive. Photoshop Elements is also very good and much cheaper.

If you can, try to acquire some DSLR camera (Canon or Nikon ;-)) and lenses. But I think that your camera is OK for the beginning.

Good luck!

PS: Sorry for my bad English.

Comment by Jane
2008-03-07 20:18:09

Dear Dejan,

Thank you so much for your prompt reply! It is very helpful! My Dad said that I might try shooting in TIFF and this confirms it. I did not want to have to get a new camera to start out with - maybe eventually (-: iStockphoto.com did ask me to submit three more samples, even though they had to reject the first three, so I think I’m doing o.k. with composition and lighting.

If you have the time, I have two more questions:

1) I have set the Noise Reduction to “high” on my camera under Picture Adjustment. If I use scene settings like “Party” for inside shots to get better color in the photo, or “Sports” for action shots, do I risk getting more artifacting and noise?

2) Is there a book you would recommend for learning stock photography?

I realize I have a ton to learn, but it is a great adventure! I do love taking photographs and it is great to think that I am a little closer to solving the artifacting/noise problem. (Also, It seems to me that artifacting and noise are a separate issue/problem from focus.)

Thanks again for your time!

Jane
(P.S. No need to apologize for your English - you communicate quite well!)

Comment by Dejan Subscribed to comments via email
2008-03-09 08:29:00

Hello Jane!

I’m very happy if you think that my words are usefully!

First of all: you wrote “I do love taking photographs…”. It is THE MOST IMPORTANT thing for success.

I didn’t have experience with your camera and I don’t know exactly (anybody knows here?) effects of settings in Picture Adjustments.

But some universal tips are:
Don’t shoot JPEGs; Shoot TIFFs (as you already know ;-)) and buy more memory cards because TIFFs are several times bigger than JPEGs.
Always use at least sensitivity as possible. In your case it is ISO 80. You can use ISO 100 nad try to forget ISO 200 and 400.
With TIFFs you will avoid artifactings, and with low ISO values you will avoid noise.
Use aperture values between 4 and 8 (4, 5.6, 8) for best lens performance.
Try to learn reading the histogram (use Google).
If you have pictures taken with higer ISO values (200 and 400) and with noticeable noise (eventually), try some of the following programs: Neat Image, Noise Ninja, Noiseware… for removing noise.

I have following books:
Digital Photography Book, Scott Kelby
The Photoshop Book for Digital Photographers, Scott Kelby
Both of them are excellent. Visit http://www.scottkelby.com/ and carefully check the whole site.

I also have this book:
Real World Digital Photography, Katrin Eismann, Tim Grey, Sean Duggan
Try to find this book. Explains (almost) everything.

I don’t have idea about the books especially for stock photography. These book will help you to understand photography (cameras, lenses, techniques, software…) and to make good/excellent photos. Almost every photo like that is suitable for stock.

Visit stock sites’ forums where you can find many advices, tips, tricks from first hand. Also, on these sites you can find official regulations.

Visit this, too: http://www.russellbrown.com/tips_tech.html. There you can find and download many of EXCELLENT movies about processing images in Photoshop.

…And this: http://photo.net/learn/

The best library is internet, and your best friend is Google. Include these words and phrases in the serches: photography tips and tricks, portrait lightening, studio lightening, lightening tips and tricks… Be imaginative.

Try to acquire DSLR one day. Find used body to save money for lenses (for example Canon’s 350/400D or Nikon’s D50/70/80). Bodie comes and goes, but good lens (lenses) stays for a long time.

If you are OK with composition and lightening, as you said, you will learn other important things for sure. With many of learning, effort, patience… your great adventure will paid-off and you will enjoy fruits of your work.

Be happy, have a good work and good luck!!!

…and read Kipling’s poem “IF” ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jane
2008-03-09 15:47:11

Dejan,

Thank you, again, for such a SUPER, complete response! I am sure that it will be VERY HELPFUL to many other beginning photographers reading these comments as well.

I appreciate the reference to Rudyard Kipling’s poem, too. Hadn’t read it in years and it is a real encouragement to hold to one’s values and persevere!

With all those excellent websites and books you listed, I have enough homework for a few years, I think! Looking forward to learning it.

Many thanks and may God bless you abundantly for your generosity!

Jane

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by the_red
2008-03-11 22:48:09

hi..thanx a lot for yr info. since our earning is based on what people are searching for the pictures… so the question is..can i get the info on “the people demand” on the photo?

Comment by Dejan Subscribed to comments via email
2008-03-13 10:01:17

@the_red
Carefully check out the stock sites. The answer should be yes.

 
 
Comment by Arunes
2008-03-19 04:08:34

Sir,
I am from Tripura, which is a small state of INDIA. How can I get payment if I sell my photo in website. There are no international bank in this stae.
Arunesh

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-04-07 02:35:12

The easiest way is to get payment by check or paypal. Ask your local banks if they would accept an overseas check. Good luck!

 
 
Comment by sam jackson
2008-04-13 21:37:07

hi, i loved your article, but when thinking about it its not really for me, my photographs arnt ’stock’ photographs, as i am planning to sell them in gallerys for a lot more than .30c but i wanted to know if you know anywhere that i could put my images online for free and have a gallery or website of my work where i could sell it for a price i choose, or one thats a bit higher??

 
Comment by John
2008-04-14 23:47:39

Hello, thanks for all the info- most useful. Your photoblog is great. As a 17 year old uni student I am only a budding photgrapher with tight finances. I am not the greatest photographer (though am learning) however I do know my way around photshop well. I was wondering how much editing is acceptable to the upload of stock sites or even if it is ok whether you would recommend it or that graphic artists prefer to do that themselves (if they buy the liscence appropriate to do so).
Thanks!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-04-23 08:40:57

Very little. Usually they prefer if you only do curve/level adjustments. Unless when you’re shooting people, many designers want people shot with clean white background. In this case, you can use your photoshop skills to remove the background.

If you’re also good in illustrations/3D imaging.. then this is the right place to sell your works.

Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Misha
2008-04-16 10:15:44

Wow! This is amazing. I have been thinking of selling my photos online for years, but now I am really trying to DO it… and this is a great idea. I am glad that I happened upon your site! Thanks

Misha

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-05-28 04:55:49

Good luck MIsha!

 
 
Comment by Courtney
2008-05-05 20:39:12

Hi,

I started in the stock game last year, and your article was a great help. Thankyou!

I am working on a mac and am now looking for a way to upload to multiple sites using one piece of software. Do you use one or have any recommendations?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-05-28 04:57:55

I’ve heard about this software but actually never used them myself..

Anyone?

 
 
Comment by Cynthia Blue
2008-05-06 15:20:36

Thanks for the info, great post I’ll be checking these companies out.

 
Comment by Brian
2008-05-26 12:57:23

Hi! a friend recommended i do this and your page is the first one i came upon looking into the opportunity. great description! i’m looking forward in trying it myself for i’ve been offered and paid money before for some shots i took. I looked at your pictures on http://www.photoblogku.com/index.php?x=browse&category= and they look fantastic. if it’s ok with you, how can i make a similar photo collection page like yours? best regards!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-05-28 05:00:13

I use pixelpost software for my photoblog. You can download tons of themes for free. Just google it, sure you’ll find them!

 
 
Comment by Shubha Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-01 03:45:23

Lovely positive vibes visiting your site/blog - congratulations and many thanks to you !

I was wondering: I took shots of random village kids and got lovely smiles….but now, how will I ever get a model contract for them, I could never go back and locate them/their parents! Does this mean I cannot sell these shots as stock?

Glad for any tips.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-06-02 02:42:25

You still can submit them as editorial stock photos.

 
 
Comment by Shubha Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-02 08:44:16

Thanks, Rusyanto! I hope that is your name?!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-06-12 17:56:06

No worries and all the best!

 
 
Comment by wan Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-03 19:43:42

This is great..thanks..

 
Comment by Eddie
2008-06-22 08:09:04

Hi all,
Great blog, verry informative.

I have a legal question. I’ve just returned from mexico and have some great shots of children in a Myan village. I did have a model release form but the children and their parents were illiterate. Our tour guide did translate and the mother was happy to release images of her children but was unable to complete the form. I would prefer to use iStock for my images. Is there a work around for this situation?

Would really appreciate your help!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-06-23 21:48:10

Hi Eddie,

You might want to ask the agency where you want to submit those images to.. As far as I know, the rule is pretty simple, no model release means you can only sell your photos as editorial stockphoto.

Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Joe
2008-07-11 15:41:28

I have a Kodak z810. Is this camera capable of taking the 4 mp pictures required for submission?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-07-25 04:21:12

I’d strongly recommend that you use at least a 6 MP DSLR camera.

 
 
Comment by mainephotonut
2008-07-16 15:15:47

It took me two days…but I finally read your entire post + comments.

While I was reading it I kept asking myself..”what’s the catch…why is he disclosing all this…what does he have to gain by doing so?”

In the end, I realize that your a fellow photographer looking to further enhance his craft, and sharing tips and tricks along the way.
Isn’t that what it’s all about?

I thank you very much.

Kevin

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-07-25 04:26:24

Good luck Kevin!

 
 
Comment by Phil
2008-07-17 08:58:59

I have taken thousands of photos in the past of a child who lives with my wife and I. Do these photo’s require a release from the childs’ guardian even though they are my own personal work?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-07-25 04:29:05

Yes, every photo with recognizable faces will require a signed model release.

Comment by Dr Michael Bellamy Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-31 12:48:23

I’m currently selling and doing well on I.S. but as exclusive. What I simply cannot understand is that the agreement says I cannot use rejected photos on any other site, but why?

If they reject them then why can’t I sell them on S.S.? I just recently opened an account on S.S. It’s a wonderful site.

Is this even legal for them (i.S.)to deny me the chance to sell photos which I believe can do quite well on another site?

 
 
 
Comment by Baki Toktas Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-30 09:56:22

Its a brilliant article, niceone and all the best for sharing such information. I just wanted to ask, can we edit the images then submit it to the agent or does it need to be original untouched photos.

Many Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-07-30 12:17:36

I think agencies will reject photos with over-editing just because most photo buyers want to buy untouched photos to be used on their projects.

What I usually do for my photos is playing a little bit with contrast curve and saturation.

Good luck!

 
 
Comment by Dr Michael Bellamy Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-31 13:25:18

My question refers to the Guild laws:
http://www.gag.org/contracts/glossary.html which states that:

“When artwork is rejected, the client has chosen NOT to obtain any rights to the use of the artwork.”

So I.S. has no legal right to keep me from posting a photo they reject onto another site unless they pay a “Kill Fee”?

 
Comment by Dr Michael Bellamy Subscribed to comments via email
2008-08-01 07:04:11

I’m currently selling and doing well on I.S. but as exclusive. What I simply cannot understand is that the agreement says I cannot use rejected photos on any other site, but why?

If they reject them then why can’t I sell them on S.S.? I just recently opened an account on S.S. It’s a wonderful site.

Is this even legal for them (i.S.)to deny me the chance to sell i.s. REJECTED photos which I believe can do quite well on another site?

Comment by John
2008-08-01 12:28:21

I think you should’ve asked this question when you’re about to press the agree button on IS exclusive terms and agreements.

Once you’ve press the button, then I guess you should obey all the rules stated there. Whatever it is..

Just my 2 cents

 
 
Comment by Dr Michael Bellamy Subscribed to comments via email
2008-08-03 11:18:05

John,

Thank you for the quick response. I am considering termination of my exclusive with i.S. Although I make over $1200 per month on average with I.S., I assume S.S. has a more professional relationship with it’s artists. I am already with SAG, so I will now consider GAG as well.

Cheers,
Dr. Mike

Comment by Dean
2008-08-08 13:03:02

Mike, with that earning.. how many photos do you have on IS. I have around 400 or so photos spread over the agencies mentioned on this article and earning around $1000/month

I’ve been thinking of joining IS exclusive for ages and still can not decide it. How much do you think I will earn with 400 photos if I become IS exclusive photographer?

Thanks!!

 
 
Comment by diane dickson
2008-08-08 13:48:49

I’m a newbie and really appreciate your insights and tips; thanks for your generosity of spirit. I have two questions: You recommend limiting editing of photos so should I avoid sharpening completely? Do you have any security/identity theft concerns re: giving stock agencies personal identifying info. such as social security #, passport, etc.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-08-15 05:49:21

Sharpening should be fine.. Just don’t overdo it..

 
 
Comment by James Austin Subscribed to comments via email
2008-08-10 00:17:31

My questions are about the Model Release for non-US persons like whan you are out of the US. What happens in that case? Do you find other nationalities cooperative when you hand them the Model Release? Especially when the Release is in English and they may not be able to read English. Do they usually sign it? How do you handle that situation? Thank you for the article and thank you for taking questions.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-08-15 06:07:49

Well, my models for the moment just limited to family and friends.. So I’ve never had any problems regarding signing model release.

 
 
Comment by Stephen Lewis
2008-08-19 10:50:38

Hi

I am completely new to this and quite new to digital photography. Would it be fair to say that an 8mb compact camera is not suitable for this and that I should buy an SLR?

Also, if I was to scan my negatives from my 35mm SLR into a digital format, would they be deemed suitable in terms of resolution?

With thanks

Stephen

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-09-07 22:16:55

I’d strongly recommend you to get a DSLR camera if you want to start selling your photos. It’s not about how many megapixel a camera has, but rather the size of camera CMOS/CCD sensor when it comes to the quality of your photos.

Check out this link from wikipedia for a good explanation.

 
 
Comment by nagabhushan
2008-08-28 02:01:15

Hi,

i just bought a kodak 7MP camera, please let me know if this quality is sufficient for me to post

Regards
Nagabhushan

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-09-07 22:19:48

Same as above.. Try to get a DSLR camera even with less megapixels since you can get a much better photo quality when shooting with it.

 
 
2008-09-02 18:19:30

Hi

I’m so glad I stumbled across your article, it’s fantastic.

How many photographs would you recomend as a minimum to a stock site? I haven’t uploaded to anyone yet and the thought of uploading 800+ pics to each site is a bit daunting.

Also, as well as photography work I really want to find somwhere to upload my digital artwork to. Can you recomend a stock site which would suit my work , maybe there are specialist sites that you know of or have come across?

Thankyou for your time :)

Blessings

Angie*

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-09-07 22:27:55

Well, just upload as much as you can. No pain no gain.. ;) But remember, only upload your best works!.. There are many great photographers right now, uploading your so so photos with flaws (ie. digital noise)can only get them rejected by the agencies and it really can put you down.

 
 
Comment by Robert Subscribed to comments via email
2008-09-09 12:33:35

Hey,
I’ve been follow this blog since I started stock photography earlier this year. I am glad to have found this blog to use as a reference guide for what to expect from these sites. Your earnings and exceptance percentages are much higher than mine! Your quality of work is obviously better. Plus I am new to photography and have really only been messing with it for 2 or so years…. more seriously recently though. I was wondering if you could post a link to one of your portfolios….. like Dreamstime or which ever one you prefer so I can maybe see how you work your magic!

THANKS!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-09-15 22:11:43

Hi Robert,

Most photos on my photoblog are also submitted to the agencies mentioned above.

You can find the link from the FAQ above..

 
 
Comment by Remmy
2008-09-15 03:38:13

Great, great site!
Was looking to buy a camera,and it is hard to decide tho my budget is limited to about $1500
What do you think about
Canon EOS 400D KIT - EF 18-55 mm / EF 55-200 mm
Do you think I can get good acceptance rate of photos made with this camera?

Thanks,
Remmy

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-09-15 22:35:15

Hi Remmy, I think that should be fine.. BUT just in case you have couple of hundred dollars more to spend, here’s my suggestion..

Camera: 400D (body only) $560
Lenses:
- Wide: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L ($700)
- Telelens: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L ($600)

 
 
Comment by nagabhushan
2008-09-16 05:53:00

HI,

I have shot about 300 photos,can i upload all the 300 photos at above mentioned websites all at once.

glad for reply

Regards
Nagabhushan

Comment by Timothy
2008-09-25 10:20:22

You used to be able to do that, but now with many new photographers selling their photos, most agencies have their daily limit rule. For example dt only allows you to upload 50 photos per day.

 
 
Comment by Keith
2008-09-26 03:19:15

An excellent read. I have been taking photos for many years now, and people keep telling me I should sell them, as you do on those websites.

By the way, your photos are great!
(hence your good sales)

I mainly do travel type photos like you do, and animals when I can find any here in Tokyo, or Japan.

Question: They don’t mind photos with Photoshop effects on them? Velvia color, saturation… etc etc. How about good HDR photos?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-03 13:19:47

Thanks for your complement on my photos Keith.. Much appreciated! ;)

HDR photos sure look pretty but they’re not selling really well on this agencies.

What I usually do to my photos in term ‘image editing’ is just adding a little bit of saturation (if necessary) and adjust the brightness and contrast level.

Comment by Keith
2008-10-18 07:23:29

Thanks for your reply.

I signed up to some agencies, and I am starting to earn a few dollars with the photos they have accepted so far.

I have so many photos to try and get submitted and have certainly improved my photography skills in the last few weeks just by looking at galleries like yours and try my best. As well as new Canon L series lens :)

 
 
 
Comment by Ash
2008-09-26 09:45:03

Hi ppl! Pls somebody tell me why it depends on what country I live? please! I enjoyed reading …

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-03 13:23:56

Are you asking about this question?

“1. Can I make a living out of this?
Well, I think it all depends on which country you’re living in.”

 
 
Comment by DeWayne
2008-10-01 14:03:15

What a great blog!!! You have some outstanding content on making some money with quality photos!! Thanks for sharing your information, which has inspired me…I use to take pictures for Walmart and that is a far cry from the master pieces your producing.

My backround is in art and I took an excellent art course at a University back in the early 1990’s.

The internet has opened up some innovative jobs for people who want to work from home. This is refreshing information to find in an internet sea of false claims and never ending scams.

I fully realize this will take some work and there is going to be trial and error, but this is the best opportunity I’ve seen for a starving artist with talent!

Take care,

DeWayne

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-03 13:26:43

Great to see people are inspired after reading the article.

All the best with your new endeavor! ;)

 
 
Comment by Vince DSouza
2008-10-07 06:36:45

I want to upload to different site for sale. Which sites do I avoid i.e. those that require exclusivity. Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-12 04:05:57

If you do not have any plan to become an exclusive photographer, I’d recommend you to avoid Istock because:
1. You can only upload 15 photos per week (hence you’ll need a very long time to build up your portfolio).
2. This is just my guess, but I think IS gives their non-exclusive photographers a hard time when accepting photos since my acceptance rate on IS is really bad compared to other agencies.

 
 
Comment by Tamika Subscribed to comments via email
2008-10-08 02:15:02

Hi there,

Have you ever tried to sell your prints with Deviant Art?

I have been with them for a while. They are a great company.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-12 04:12:22

No, I haven’t.. but I might give it a try one day. You said you’ve been with them for a while. How’s your prints sale?

 
 
Comment by Henrik
2008-10-13 11:20:54

Very informative!

 
Comment by idilium
2008-10-18 23:10:54

thanks for all this information and the help you are giving us.

one question i love macro photos more than anything but you think macros is a good are for selling stock?

thanks againg

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-26 18:36:04

Usually business theme macro shots are selling well.

 
 
Comment by Focal Point
2008-10-22 11:39:17

Hello… I cant believe the info at hand, very informative and very inspiring. Many thanks!

Now to my questions;

1. Like to the question above, are macro shots ideal?

2. Are we allowed to edit the pictures in a photo program first before we upload them? I mean, clean up any noise, change lighting, brighten/darken… etc. This leads into my next question

3. Can we upload artistic photos that have been edited in a photo program? Meaning ones with filter work and such?

Again, many thanks for your blog.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-26 18:46:37

1. as above..
2. What I usually do before submitting my photos in term of editing are playing with the curve and boost the saturation a little bit. I would not recommend you to clean up any noise using your photo editor. It’d be much better if you shoot with a DSLR camera using low ISO..
3. Nope. There’s a 99% of chance that your artistic photos with filter work will be rejected.

Hope that helps.

Comment by Focal Point
2008-10-26 21:19:12

Thanks for the reply… your suggestions are noted and appreciated!

 
 
 
Comment by Kambiz Subscribed to comments via email
2008-10-27 07:17:44

Hello,

Many thanks for sharing your valuable information!

Q.A very important thing as I learned here is adding key words to photos and this is not very easy to me.
Is there any software to make it easier?

I wish you a leap beyond the signs,

Kambiz

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-29 18:58:05

Hi Kambiz, thank you for your appreciation.

Have you tried to google it? Try to search “stock photography keyword software” and it looks like there are couple of companies make such software.

All the best!

 
 
Comment by HerrySW Subscribed to comments via email
2008-10-29 08:02:35

Dear Sir, I thought you are foreigner but later on I know you are Indonesian, live in Jakarta, same as me..:)). Thanx for a really helpful sharing; knowledge is really weird, the more we give away, the more we will receive..:)) Btw, I have one question: I like to shoot manufacturing plant (due to my job nature-I’m insurance surveyor), for example: warehouse, racking system in warehouse, boiler, generator set, excavator (heavy equipment), backhoe, etc. For post processing, I use HDR (you have said that HDR is less likely to be successful), so I will just use curve/gradient/saturation etc. Do you think my kind of image will be successful? Thank you very much. Herry.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-10-30 01:33:50

an e-mail has been sent to your Gmail account…

Cheers!

 
 
Comment by mike koicuba Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-08 05:13:43

hello, i love this site . packed full of lots of helpful surprises . its as good as an unexpected christmas present on a chill to the bone christmas morning . just awesome ,thank you . i had a question or two .is there a way to upload all your pics to all the sites yo u reccomend at the same time .i was hoping this way people couldnt buy your photo and post it to another site to sell before you upload the same pic threw out the different sites . there are so m any pictures on alot of these sites . how does the picture hosting site now if the picture your sending them is not already on there site ? i realize that some sites might only allow you to upload a certain amount of pics a day or week? what sites do you reccomend that allow you to upload as many as you want , no limit and how many pics are you allowed to upload to them at a time . is there a way people can left click and save your pic to there computer and resell your pic without paying for it .? what sites dont have there sites copyright image over top your pic downloaded to there site to prevent this ? thank you and happy selling

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-10 21:47:36

Hi Mike,

That’s exactly what I do. Since I’m not an exclusive photographer to any agency, I uploaded the same pictures to all agencies mentioned above. Some photos were accepted by one agency and rejected by others.

SS does not have daily limitation rules. You can upload as many as you want. Always make sure only upload your best works. Quality is always better than quantity in this industry.

All sites have a watermark on photos, so don’t worry about it

 
 
Comment by mike koicuba Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-08 05:28:19

hello again. i thought id send an another question that might help others as well. i went to alexa and typed in names of sites that you mentioned and others as well to look at traffic to those sites . what in your opionion is the most important things to consider when looking at the picture hosting sites on alexa? is it the traffic ? or and the amount on the graph where the lines are at ? some sites i put in didnt even show a graph but they had alot of traffic . and some sites didint have alot of traffic but had high graph lines that ididint make much sense to me ? its confusing ? how does a newbe like me understand whats the important things to look at when doing research on alexa with different photo posting sites to sell my image , thank you .

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-10 21:54:14

Actually, these alexa graphs are not that accurate. I think it’s better if you spend your time on researching what kind of photos that made it to the best seller list on each stock site and also increasing your photography skills so you can submit the same quality photos (or even better) to those sites ;)

 
 
Comment by LimYK Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-12 03:19:12

hello. This website is great. I’ve been shooting with my 450D for few months and thinking of earning $$ from my photos. I’ve seen most of the stock photos from ShutterStock.com have completely plain backgrounds. How did they do it? Is that important in stock photography?

Can you recommend the websites that you think are good and worth uploading my photos to?

Thanks for any advice

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-18 03:10:33

Hello,

You can get a white background and set up a small studio in your house. Or, alternatively you can remove the background and change it with plain colors such as white or green in Photoshop or other photo editing softwares.

Designers love these images and they’re selling quite well.

Sites worth uploading are mentioned on the article above.. Well, except for iStock.. It’s just getting harder and harder to sell images on their site if you’re not their exclusive photographer

 
 
Comment by mike koicuba Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-12 06:20:03

hello thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questions. heres some more. do you upload your pics to the websites then make up your keywords or make up your keywords first ?how many keywords do you put with a pic nowadays? not to steal any of your ideas , but what method do you use to find keywords for your pictures,nowadays? i have anywhere from 10 to 50 keywords per image. i have like 200 [pictures to upload to all the sites. i only have keywords for 10 pictures so far . that is a long process. anymore help on keyword issue would be great . this site is awesome. so much help and info. i realize some of the questions i asked has been answered but that was a few yrs ago. maybe some things changed has you do this or that and maybe there is better ideas . im interested in seeing what methods people use to find there keywords nowadays.thank you everyone

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-18 03:22:17

Please check out our microstock photoraphy category for some keywording tips.

 
 
Comment by Gary Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-15 23:22:45

I have numerous shots of wildlife and birds of prey. Is there a particular agency that you would recommend placing them with?

Great website and thanks for the support!

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-18 03:30:43

Well, I honestly don’t know which agency is better for selling wildlife photos.

If I were you, I’d upload my photos to all sites mentioned above and see which site sells better.

All the best!!

 
 
Comment by Aly Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-16 15:13:21

Thank you so much for such an informative blog! I have been a photographer for many years and am only just discovering the wonderful world of web based sales.

One question I have for you though, I am wondering about putting photos on these sites that have been taken for clients. One such instance would be some equine shots of a stallion that I took for a client. Would I need permission from the owner of the horse if there are no people in the shots?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-11-18 03:35:25

I know you’ll need a ‘model release’ when you’re submitting people photos with recognizable faces. You’ll also need a ‘property release’ when submitting some building images. But, I don’t think you’ll need an ‘animal release’ when submitting photos of horses, cats, dogs, birds, etc

 
 
Comment by Aly Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-18 12:57:26

Thank you for responding so quickly! I was kind of thinking that was the case but wasn’t sure. I am looking forward to this new venture! I sure hope that I have just a small amount of your success, it is a start anyway!

 
Comment by mike koicuba Subscribed to comments via email
2008-11-20 20:03:39

hello, thank you for never letting us down wit h answering back with answers to our questions. this is a question that im surprised no one else asked about . atleast i dont think they did.here it is .. i noticed on some sites they show you by clicking on the pictures that are being sold . how many people looked at that particular photo and also how many times it was downloaded. like say for instance snapvillage.com. in which they have these 2 features. my questions is what sites that you mentioned above or others that you know show how many of a particular image was sold and how many times it was looked at by clicking on it , or someother way ? this can also help a person with what pictures are selling and which ones arent. i realize that some sites alow you to look and see what is the most popular image but i m looking for more info on any particular one image( like snapvillage) , not a whole block of a certain field of images. thank you . i have been googling my questions as well

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2008-12-08 03:02:55

Well, DT has this feature. You can see the total views of an image and also show how many times it was downloaded.

Comment by Mas Subscribed to comments via email
2009-03-12 00:27:10

Can you monitor who downloaded your pictures and even better, where they are being used?
I’m a professional photographer from Thailand and have always resisted the large micro stock agencies due to devaluing my work.
Do you have any advise on this ‘concern’ or can recommend any agencies working on ‘rights managed’ images?
One agency which has been recommended by several pro-photographers is Alamy.
Any advice would be gratefully accepted!
Thanks

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2008-12-11 13:05:50

Hi
I have been taking photos in Raw for the last year or so but I have a lot of photos ranging from .7MB to 3.2MB taken before 2005. If I use software like Genuine Fractals can I improve the resolution so that some photos may be accepted by Micro Stock Photography agencies?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-01-14 03:24:28

They won’t accept photo resized with GF. However, you may want to try Alamy which allows you to upsize your pics

 
 
Comment by Mariana Subscribed to comments via email
2008-12-11 23:00:17

I only can say, thank you very much for all these information, fantastic!

I am thinking about it. A lot of people are telling me that I should sell my photos.

I will follow your tips.

Have a nice day and Merry Christmas!

Very inspiring,

Greetings from Holland,

Mariana

 
Comment by graphpaper Subscribed to comments via email
2008-12-20 18:07:20

I’m on the opposite side of the fence as you all. I rarely ever take pictures and don’t even own a camera capable of the 4 megapixel minimum. I do buy stock photos for my web design work.

I’m thinking of buying a camera and taking a few pictures. As a web designer I know exactly what types of shots are useful to my work. My thought is that I can take some of the photos I need myself, and also offset the cost of stock images by having some of my own for sale. Do any of these companies give more in terms of credits if I use them to purchase other photos?

I’m no photographer so I don’t plan to make oodles of cash from my pictures. I also rarely ever use an image that that is more than 400×600 in my own design work. What level of camera should I be looking at? I doubt I can justify the cost of a DSLR.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-01-14 03:25:31

Thanks for your insight..
Much appreciated!

 
 
Comment by Robert Subscribed to comments via email
2009-01-16 07:53:31

Do all of your stock sites send you W9 forms so that they can file a 1099. I got a request from shutterstock, but, have not received any W9’s from the other sites that I’m with.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-03 02:40:13

I don’t live in the US.. So I think it’s better if you email the sites admin asking about the form.

 
 
Comment by leila
2009-01-19 06:08:00

here is so much good information, thanks.
i joined fotolia, but i´m confused- i can sell my photos, put there is no information about how i get money. to they use paypal or something else?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-03 02:28:18

There are couple of payment options available from fotolia. I personally choose paypal.

 
 
Comment by liili
2009-01-19 08:47:25

I love taking pictures and idea to sell them on internet is super, but I only have Canon powershot A460. I understand that it´s not good enough, but still, can any of these micro-stock accept my fotos? So I could earn extra money to buy new and better camera.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-03 02:38:11

With many photographers now own a DSLR camera, I think it’s going to be hard to get the shots from the A460 accepted on sites mentioned above.

 
 
Comment by abdalmjid
2009-01-25 09:08:36

Abdul Majid Alfaragany photographer from Libya, the Director-General of the Libyan imaging
Associated Press photographer, told the U.S.There are many pictures of the desert and beautiful pictures of the possible to sell these pictures
00218913201495

 
Comment by Lou Subscribed to comments via email
2009-01-29 15:40:47

Great and informative site…thank you very much. The answer to my question may be somewhere in the comments (I tried to read most of the comments but there are soooo many!) but I would like to know do you shoot in RAW format and then convert to JPEG? I sent pics to IS after shooting with my Nikon D80 with a Nikon lens in JPEG and they all got rejected. I joined the other sites you mentioned but dont want to send photos yet until I get a better idea of how to send them. Any suggestions?

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-03 02:49:03

Hi Lou,

Yup, that’s correct. I only submit JPEG (highest quality) converted from RAW. So, if your photos got rejected by IS, I’m sure it’s not because you sent them in JPEG.

Didn’t they tell you why your photos got rejected? Something like; poor lighting, digital noise, etc.

Comment by Lou Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-03 13:12:54

They said one of the culprits was digital noise and another was overexposure. Since I shot in jpeg instead of raw (a mistake I wont make again) I can see why there would be problems. Can you also suggest a software to help remove noise or other artifacts? I read online that Photo Shop is good but I would like to hear your opinion.

Thanks for your help.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-03 22:44:54

Well, the best way to remove digital noise is to avoid it in the first place by shooting with low ISO (100-200)

Noise removal software won’t help much, since it will also softened your image. I personally never use this software for my stock images.

Anyway, there are couple of software you can use such as noise ninja or neat image. Try this page: http://photoediting.dphotojournal.com/?s=noise

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lou Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-04 07:52:37

Sounds good…thanks again for all your input! :-)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Valentino Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-20 02:26:46

Great reed, fantastic job my friend.

I was wondering if you do Opt out or Opt in, in iStock. Whats the difference?

Thanks for the inspiration, just got my first 2 images approved at iS.

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-27 05:27:06

I do opt in on all of my images but if you want to control which files are sold to both Pay-as-you-go and Subscription plans just click the ‘All Off’ button in your Control Panel. You can also opt-out individual files from the ‘Edit File’ details page.

 
 
Comment by tuvoca Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-25 13:10:14

Please put a user name in the article so that people can give you credit when they sign up to sites like shutterstock. All I could give them was this site and the URL of your photoblog. :(

 
Comment by jesse Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-27 00:27:49

Hi I was just wondering if after you’ve up loaded your photos if your still given credit for your work. Are there some photos that get royalties? but really what I’m wondering is are you acknowledged for your work when its sold. Is your name on your photos? or do you loose all credit once youve sold them to the sites.

Hope to hear from ya soon. Thanks

Comment by Dphotojournal com
2009-02-27 05:52:14

Well, I can say that you will loose credit once your photos sold and used for brochures & advertisements. Nobody but you and the buyer will know that it’s your work that being used. But, that’s just how it works. Have you ever seen any advertisements or brochures with the name of their photographers/designers on them? Probably not.

It’s different when your photos are used for books or magazines. On most cases, your name will be on the photos and I even have some buyers who are willing to send me books and magazines where I have my photos on them.

 
 
Comment by amy mcalister Subscribed to comments via email
2009-03-04 04:49:30

hi, really enjoyed this blog but still find it confusing about being non-exclusive… i just applied to istockphoto with the three sample photos…. i am non-exclusive with them, so does this mean that i can upload THE SAME PHOTOS to other sites ????? what about same photos, different angles or different shots etc????? help please!!!
amy

Comment by