http://www.dphotojournal.com/pentax-k-7-review-sample-photos/ Thu, 04 Apr 2013 05:48:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.dphotojournal.com/pentax-k-7-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-190957 David Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:20:57 +0000 http://www.dphotojournal.com/pentax-k-7-review-sample-photos/#comment-190957 I would definitely go for the pentax k20d. It has the same resolution, has no video capability and almost for the same price as the k7 body, you can get k20d + da 16-45mm f/4 + da 50-200mm f/4-5.6 which should cover most situations. I've read the 16-45 has a very good macro. I would definitely go for the pentax k20d. It has the same resolution, has no video capability and almost for the same price as the k7 body, you can get k20d + da 16-45mm f/4 + da 50-200mm f/4-5.6 which should cover most situations. I’ve read the 16-45 has a very good macro.

]]> http://www.dphotojournal.com/pentax-k-7-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-190948 zal Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:38:09 +0000 http://www.dphotojournal.com/pentax-k-7-review-sample-photos/#comment-190948 what bothers me in K-7 is the video feature. For those who are strictly in photography, amateurs, advanced, pros...this feature is totally useless and only occupies a valuable space on a camera and only a candy for weekend photographers I have K10D and planning to move to 15mp, and I don't need the video. Can anybody recommend a 15mp Pentax or Canon/Nikon/Olympus is close to the quality of K-7, but without the video? what bothers me in K-7 is the video feature.
For those who are strictly in photography, amateurs, advanced, pros…this feature is totally useless and only occupies a valuable space on a camera and only a candy for weekend photographers
I have K10D and planning to move to 15mp, and I don’t need the video. Can anybody recommend a 15mp Pentax or Canon/Nikon/Olympus is close to the quality of K-7, but without the video?

]]>