<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic DMC-FZ35/FZ38</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: malena</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-252233</link>
		<dc:creator>malena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-252233</guid>
		<description>hi i am planing to buy fz35 but i am not sure about photo quality in low light.is it blurry or fine.plz suggest me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i am planing to buy fz35 but i am not sure about photo quality in low light.is it blurry or fine.plz suggest me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-230349</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-230349</guid>
		<description>I bought the FZ35 to supplement my DSLR.  I have gotten ALOT of images that I would have missed because of having to switch lenses.  It is also far more practical to lug one camera into the woods than a bag full of lenses.  Each camera has its niche, but the Panasonic FZ35 is the clear winner for practicality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the FZ35 to supplement my DSLR.  I have gotten ALOT of images that I would have missed because of having to switch lenses.  It is also far more practical to lug one camera into the woods than a bag full of lenses.  Each camera has its niche, but the Panasonic FZ35 is the clear winner for practicality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boldriks</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-226075</link>
		<dc:creator>boldriks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-226075</guid>
		<description>It was very hard to switch from broken Canon G7 to Lumix FZ-38. Actually macro is not the best one here. Would I recommend it? Well, depends on price you have to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was very hard to switch from broken Canon G7 to Lumix FZ-38. Actually macro is not the best one here. Would I recommend it? Well, depends on price you have to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-221498</link>
		<dc:creator>wumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-221498</guid>
		<description>&quot;The color of the images taken by Nikon P-90 is superior than panasonic.&quot; 

While your opinion is valid I would have to say that that is one opinion.

The panny is fantastic and I would highly recommend it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The color of the images taken by Nikon P-90 is superior than panasonic.&#8221; </p>
<p>While your opinion is valid I would have to say that that is one opinion.</p>
<p>The panny is fantastic and I would highly recommend it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamil Sayed</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-217795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamil Sayed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-217795</guid>
		<description>Nikon P-90 appears to me to be a better camera. The color of the images taken by Nikon P-90 is superior than panasonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon P-90 appears to me to be a better camera. The color of the images taken by Nikon P-90 is superior than panasonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ooty</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-217224</link>
		<dc:creator>ooty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/panasonic-dmc-fz35-review-sample-photos/#comment-217224</guid>
		<description>I bought this camera. I love this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this camera. I love this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.458 seconds -->

