Comments on: Nikon D3H Rumor

By: James

James — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:23:11 +0000

Wrong i have seen this camera it actually shoots at 14fps and doesn’t look like it will be out anytime soon so dont get your hopes up

By: Nikt

Nikt — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:48:49 +0000

Let this be a lesson to you. These websites make this crap up or they just perpetuate the crap someone else makes up. You couldn’t really have gotten more of it wrong.

LBCAST: wrong
DX: wrong
New algorithm of management and treatment of the noise (revolutionary): what’s that, airy fairy rubbish

8,5 or 10 frames per second: haha hedged bets and still got it wrong,…9 and 11

Buffer of 50 JPEG or 40 RAW (NEF): wrong

LCD monitor: ISO 100 t o 1600 with extension to 3200 and more than 6400: wrong

Compact flash and SD: and still it continues, wrong

USB 2.0 (high speed) and Wt-3 Wireless: wrong

Approximately $3800 dollars: approximately is just relative word

September 2006: “missed it by ‘that’ much”

By: Devin

Devin — Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:50:36 +0000

And now Nikon has the D3 which blows these specs away and the D300 which matches these specs except the price is less than half of the Mark III. Alas, Canon has its new 21mp King but 8000 is a lot of cash

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:15:52 +0000

Wow, this was a year ago? It’s a damn shame that Nikon doesn’t have any D3H or D3X, and Canon just came out with their Canon 1D Mark III that has almost all these specs…