Nikon D3H Rumor

The latest rumor that has been floating around in french website forum “Chasseur d’Images” is that Nikon will release the new Nikon D3H this year with specifications:

Sensor: New generation LBCAST sensor with 10 megapixel
Format: DX
New algorithm of management and treatment of the noise (revolutionary)
Speed: 8,5 or 10 frames per second
Buffer of 50 JPEG or 40 RAW (NEF)
LCD monitor: 3″ with 320,000 pixels
Sensitivity: ISO 100 t o 1600 with extension to 3200 and more than 6400
Shutter Speed 30 seconds to 1/8000
Memory – Compact flash and SD
Data Transfer: USB 2.0 (high speed) and Wt-3 Wireless
Price: Approximately $3800 dollars
Announce: September 2006

Here’s a picture of the camera that I really think is fake.

Nikon D3H

See also: Rumors

Share your photos with our readers, make your own profile page, create blog, get unlimited storage for your photos, discuss photography equipment & techniques by joining our photo community

Subscribe for our latest updates sent to your e-mail (no spam)

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

RSS feed | Trackback URI


Comment by Josh
2007-03-29 07:15:52

Wow, this was a year ago? It’s a damn shame that Nikon doesn’t have any D3H or D3X, and Canon just came out with their Canon 1D Mark III that has almost all these specs…

Comment by Devin
2007-12-23 05:50:36

And now Nikon has the D3 which blows these specs away and the D300 which matches these specs except the price is less than half of the Mark III. Alas, Canon has its new 21mp King but 8000 is a lot of cash

Comment by Nikt
2008-03-31 20:48:49

Let this be a lesson to you. These websites make this crap up or they just perpetuate the crap someone else makes up. You couldn’t really have gotten more of it wrong.

LBCAST: wrong
DX: wrong
New algorithm of management and treatment of the noise (revolutionary): what’s that, airy fairy rubbish

8,5 or 10 frames per second: haha hedged bets and still got it wrong,…9 and 11

Buffer of 50 JPEG or 40 RAW (NEF): wrong

LCD monitor: ISO 100 t o 1600 with extension to 3200 and more than 6400: wrong

Compact flash and SD: and still it continues, wrong

USB 2.0 (high speed) and Wt-3 Wireless: wrong

Approximately $3800 dollars: approximately is just relative word

September 2006: “missed it by ‘that’ much”

Comment by James
2009-01-26 21:23:11

Wrong i have seen this camera it actually shoots at 14fps and doesn’t look like it will be out anytime soon so dont get your hopes up


Have Your Say

Your Comment may not appear immediately due to moderation
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your Comment.