<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D200</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I finally got the &lt;a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d200/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nikon D200&lt;/a&gt;  after being on a waiting list for more than three months. It was worth the wait! I loved my &lt;a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d70/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nikon D70&lt;/a&gt;, but with 10 megapixels and basically the guts of a much more expensive D2x, the D200 is a dream.

There are a gazillion possible settings, but right out of the box, you can start shooting with the defaults and get great images. The default exposures, color saturation, and contrast are noticeably improved over the D70, although I still have (and expect) to edit the photos in Photoshop. That's no problem - I would rather do it with the powerful Photoshop software than let the camera's firmware do it.

This camera has a really solid feel about it. It's a bit heavier than the D70, but with all the added features, that's acceptable.

With a price tag of $1700, the D200 is a bargain for serious amateurs and professionals.

More information about &lt;a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d200/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nikon D200 &#62;&#62; &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got the <a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d200/" rel="nofollow">Nikon D200</a>  after being on a waiting list for more than three months. It was worth the wait! I loved my <a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d70/" rel="nofollow">Nikon D70</a>, but with 10 megapixels and basically the guts of a much more expensive D2x, the D200 is a dream.</p>
<p>There are a gazillion possible settings, but right out of the box, you can start shooting with the defaults and get great images. The default exposures, color saturation, and contrast are noticeably improved over the D70, although I still have (and expect) to edit the photos in Photoshop. That&#8217;s no problem - I would rather do it with the powerful Photoshop software than let the camera&#8217;s firmware do it.</p>
<p>This camera has a really solid feel about it. It&#8217;s a bit heavier than the D70, but with all the added features, that&#8217;s acceptable.</p>
<p>With a price tag of $1700, the D200 is a bargain for serious amateurs and professionals.</p>
<p>More information about <a href="http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/nikon/d200/" rel="nofollow">Nikon D200 &gt;&gt; </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifer993</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifer993</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>seems to be real enough on the Nikon USA website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems to be real enough on the Nikon USA website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>The 3 images are fake.. 

Check out this messg at dpreview: 

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1007&#38;message=14863670</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3 images are fake.. </p>
<p>Check out this messg at dpreview: </p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1007&amp;message=14863670" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1007&amp;message=14863670</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeandemi</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>jeandemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>these specs are fake, a joke
see link (in french)
easy to make, modification to D2X page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these specs are fake, a joke<br />
see link (in french)<br />
easy to make, modification to D2X page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
