<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D200 Banding Issues</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Mach</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/#comment-7191</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Mach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/#comment-7191</guid>
		<description>Rather than mending the cameras with banding, NIKON seems to prefer swearing that "banding is normal" and "no malfunction has approved itself". In this respect, NIKON should also change its official logo:

http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than mending the cameras with banding, NIKON seems to prefer swearing that &#8220;banding is normal&#8221; and &#8220;no malfunction has approved itself&#8221;. In this respect, NIKON should also change its official logo:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169" rel="nofollow">http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
