<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D200 Banding Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Mach</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d200-banding-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-7191</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Mach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/?p=647#comment-7191</guid>
		<description>Rather than mending the cameras with banding, NIKON seems to prefer swearing that &quot;banding is normal&quot; and &quot;no malfunction has approved itself&quot;. In this respect, NIKON should also change its official logo:

http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than mending the cameras with banding, NIKON seems to prefer swearing that &#8220;banding is normal&#8221; and &#8220;no malfunction has approved itself&#8221;. In this respect, NIKON should also change its official logo:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169" rel="nofollow">http://forum.digineff.cz/file.php?51,file=391169</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.435 seconds -->

