<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D100 VS Nikon D200</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d100-vs-nikon-d200/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d100-vs-nikon-d200/#comment-175159</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/nikon-d100-vs-nikon-d200/#comment-175159</guid>
		<description>Look at these two pictures, I actually like the d100 picture better, but that might be because its better lit.  Anyway the difference if looking at price of buying used is $150 vs $750. The d100 was a camera that professionals were using and could still used, if we look back at their photos, we wouldn't scoff, we probably wouldn't even notice the difference as in this case.  For any beginner or any professional, it makes so much sense to stick with the d100,  you're just throwing your money away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at these two pictures, I actually like the d100 picture better, but that might be because its better lit.  Anyway the difference if looking at price of buying used is $150 vs $750. The d100 was a camera that professionals were using and could still used, if we look back at their photos, we wouldn&#8217;t scoff, we probably wouldn&#8217;t even notice the difference as in this case.  For any beginner or any professional, it makes so much sense to stick with the d100,  you&#8217;re just throwing your money away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
