<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mammatus Clouds by Jorn Olsen</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/mammatus-clouds-by-jorn-olsen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/mammatus-clouds-by-jorn-olsen/#comment-78321</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/mammatus-clouds-by-jorn-olsen/#comment-78321</guid>
		<description>Give me a photo editing software such as adobe photo shop or some other graphic program and I can make a fake opicture like this as well.  Nothing but folley so put on ur filters against folley!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a photo editing software such as adobe photo shop or some other graphic program and I can make a fake opicture like this as well.  Nothing but folley so put on ur filters against folley!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/mammatus-clouds-by-jorn-olsen/#comment-54037</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/mammatus-clouds-by-jorn-olsen/#comment-54037</guid>
		<description>The pictures of the mammatus clouds are spectacular - great contrast in the subjects.  But, the clouds themselves appear to be a little too well defined which might suggest there's been some extra post-work done one them.  They look graphically striking; but not necessarily natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pictures of the mammatus clouds are spectacular - great contrast in the subjects.  But, the clouds themselves appear to be a little too well defined which might suggest there&#8217;s been some extra post-work done one them.  They look graphically striking; but not necessarily natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
