http://www.dphotojournal.com/fujifilm-finepix-s4500-reviews-sample-photos/ Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:52:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.dphotojournal.com/fujifilm-finepix-s4500-reviews-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-605074 Greg Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:57:42 +0000 http://www.dphotojournal.com/?p=25893#comment-605074 The CNET review is asinine. Fuji make a very decent camera for the price. As for ISO. Give me a break. It would be helpful if the CNET reviewers understood photography. All camera's have a base ISO. Nikon 100 and Canon 200 for example. Above that you will get noisy pictures with any camera depending on a conditions. So saying "The more you have to go above ISO 200, however — whether for shooting indoors, using the zoom lens, or both — the less satisfied you might be with the results.” is a ludicrous statement. It's like writing a car review and saying the faster and harder you drive it the more fuel it will use - so don't buy it. Huh? I'm sick of reviewers who have an axe to grind or who are actually punting another product. Watch our for reviews on everything from so called "expert" web sites. They selling you something. Make no mistake. The CNET review is asinine. Fuji make a very decent camera for the price. As for ISO. Give me a break. It would be helpful if the CNET reviewers understood photography. All camera’s have a base ISO. Nikon 100 and Canon 200 for example. Above that you will get noisy pictures with any camera depending on a conditions. So saying “The more you have to go above ISO 200, however — whether for shooting indoors, using the zoom lens, or both — the less satisfied you might be with the results.” is a ludicrous statement. It’s like writing a car review and saying the faster and harder you drive it the more fuel it will use – so don’t buy it. Huh? I’m sick of reviewers who have an axe to grind or who are actually punting another product. Watch our for reviews on everything from so called “expert” web sites. They selling you something. Make no mistake.

]]>