<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focal Length Comparison</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/focal-length-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bjg</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/focal-length-comparison/#comment-100575</link>
		<dc:creator>bjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/focal-length-comparison/#comment-100575</guid>
		<description>The link has changed to:

http://www.usa.canon.com/app/html/EFLenses101/focal_length.html

And it is for FILM or full frame, not digital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link has changed to:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/app/html/EFLenses101/focal_length.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/app/html/EFLenses101/focal_length.html</a></p>
<p>And it is for FILM or full frame, not digital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johann Lau</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/focal-length-comparison/#comment-45383</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann Lau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 07:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/focal-length-comparison/#comment-45383</guid>
		<description>Much better:

http://www.tamroneurope.com/flc.htm
http://www.tamroneurope.com/dof.htm

=D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tamroneurope.com/flc.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.tamroneurope.com/flc.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tamroneurope.com/dof.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.tamroneurope.com/dof.htm</a></p>
<p>=D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
