<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Camera Vs. Digital Camera</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/film-camera-vs-digital-camera-sample-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ovidiu morgos</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/film-camera-vs-digital-camera-sample-photos/#comment-61983</link>
		<dc:creator>ovidiu morgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/film-camera-vs-digital-camera-sample-photos/#comment-61983</guid>
		<description>it's not about the film or camera... it's all abput the lenses! both work good and are for completely different uses! film for passion... digital for work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not about the film or camera&#8230; it&#8217;s all abput the lenses! both work good and are for completely different uses! film for passion&#8230; digital for work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/film-camera-vs-digital-camera-sample-photos/#comment-51917</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/film-camera-vs-digital-camera-sample-photos/#comment-51917</guid>
		<description>all these are compare apple to oranges,  and using 12.8milllion pixel to compare to 35mm
 
Hasselblad is medium format which is soemthing like D5 level.
 
35 mm film is like a stamp size and 6 X 6 is 6cm leh  like palm size liao
sure pic quality different after enlargemnt.
 
Digital using pixel to determine the quality of pictures, but the film is using lens to capture the picture and the chemical reaction of film towards sunlight and also processing with chemicals
otally different thing
 
Canon although is sharp, but the colour and tone already being distorted.
 
Nikon  FT# clour is more vivid as VILVA is a slide fujifilm which famous for bright colours, and Nikon famous for the colour balnce.
 
Hasselblad colour are more soft and natural which is the characteristic of German maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all these are compare apple to oranges,  and using 12.8milllion pixel to compare to 35mm</p>
<p>Hasselblad is medium format which is soemthing like D5 level.</p>
<p>35 mm film is like a stamp size and 6 X 6 is 6cm leh  like palm size liao<br />
sure pic quality different after enlargemnt.</p>
<p>Digital using pixel to determine the quality of pictures, but the film is using lens to capture the picture and the chemical reaction of film towards sunlight and also processing with chemicals<br />
otally different thing</p>
<p>Canon although is sharp, but the colour and tone already being distorted.</p>
<p>Nikon  FT# clour is more vivid as VILVA is a slide fujifilm which famous for bright colours, and Nikon famous for the colour balnce.</p>
<p>Hasselblad colour are more soft and natural which is the characteristic of German maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
