<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS 40D Rumor</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-40d-rumor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-40d-rumor/#comment-52487</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-40d-rumor/#comment-52487</guid>
		<description>It's official!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-40d-rumor/#comment-49096</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-40d-rumor/#comment-49096</guid>
		<description>The mentioned spec just cant'be right. Canon is mainly builing it's recent p&#38;s en dslr (1dmIII) on the digic III. 9 point af makes it nearly identical with the 400D, so at least 11p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mentioned spec just cant&#8217;be right. Canon is mainly builing it&#8217;s recent p&amp;s en dslr (1dmIII) on the digic III. 9 point af makes it nearly identical with the 400D, so at least 11p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
