<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS 3D Rumor</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Natascha</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-198359</link>
		<dc:creator>Natascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-198359</guid>
		<description>I am working with the 5D and I am very happy. I would say they are both great, but there is a "little" price difference...and that made my decision lot easier :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working with the 5D and I am very happy. I would say they are both great, but there is a &#8220;little&#8221; price difference&#8230;and that made my decision lot easier <img src='http://www.dphotojournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-194873</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-194873</guid>
		<description>I would just buy the 5D Mark II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just buy the 5D Mark II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Garcia Gonzales III</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-143140</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Garcia Gonzales III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-143140</guid>
		<description>http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff

Check out the screen capture for proof. The 5D, XT, and XTi are removed from Canon’s website. Then a few minutes later, there back up, and then down again. something is happening over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestubbornrock.com/5Dgone.tiff</a></p>
<p>Check out the screen capture for proof. The 5D, XT, and XTi are removed from Canon’s website. Then a few minutes later, there back up, and then down again. something is happening over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-124752</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-124752</guid>
		<description>Ask and you shall receive...depending on what you consider to be "competitive."

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D700/D700A.HTM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask and you shall receive&#8230;depending on what you consider to be &#8220;competitive.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D700/D700A.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D700/D700A.HTM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeolos</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-120131</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeolos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-120131</guid>
		<description>So, if this picture is real, may be we should wait for a 1:1.25 sensor, or just for a new L lens ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if this picture is real, may be we should wait for a 1:1.25 sensor, or just for a new L lens ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dubnoff</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-97472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dubnoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-97472</guid>
		<description>Exactly right. The whole reason people have gone crazy over the 5D is that its full frame and for a great price.  I wish Nikon would come up with something like that at a competitive price.  Once they do, I will jump on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right. The whole reason people have gone crazy over the 5D is that its full frame and for a great price.  I wish Nikon would come up with something like that at a competitive price.  Once they do, I will jump on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uganbayar</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-80888</link>
		<dc:creator>uganbayar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-80888</guid>
		<description>I want to buy 3D.Where is it?More more more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to buy 3D.Where is it?More more more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todemades</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-60434</link>
		<dc:creator>todemades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-60434</guid>
		<description>A good sense of humor &#38; perfect  .... !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good sense of humor &amp; perfect  &#8230;. !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-58774</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-58774</guid>
		<description>I'd really doubt that canon would make the new version of the 5d have a 1.3x sensor. The 5d is so popular because it has that full 35mm sensor, I doubt that they would give that up with the next version. At least, i hope not. Because I plan on buying one for that very feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really doubt that canon would make the new version of the 5d have a 1.3x sensor. The 5d is so popular because it has that full 35mm sensor, I doubt that they would give that up with the next version. At least, i hope not. Because I plan on buying one for that very feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-57147</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d/#comment-57147</guid>
		<description>Why would the 40 1.2 have a bigger diameter than the 50 1.4? It should actually be the other way around as this simple calculation clearly shows: 40/1.2 = 33.3 and 50/1.4 = 35.7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the 40 1.2 have a bigger diameter than the 50 1.4? It should actually be the other way around as this simple calculation clearly shows: 40/1.2 = 33.3 and 50/1.4 = 35.7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
