<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This Canon EOS 3D?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wibawa</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-231942</link>
		<dc:creator>Wibawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-231942</guid>
		<description>I have the Canon EOS3. It is a fantastic camera with a great exposure meter. However, the eye control never worked for me. I did a lot of calibration for my eyes and it still didn&#039;t work well it should be as per the Canon instruction. For info, I wear eye glasses, which I always suspect the main reason why the eye control function didn&#039;t work for me. I finally gave up and reverted back to the manual focus control. That&#039;s the only gripe I have with the Canon EOS 3.

Look forward to Canon EOS 3D. In my view, it should at least have a full-frame sensor and high ISO 51,200.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Canon EOS3. It is a fantastic camera with a great exposure meter. However, the eye control never worked for me. I did a lot of calibration for my eyes and it still didn&#8217;t work well it should be as per the Canon instruction. For info, I wear eye glasses, which I always suspect the main reason why the eye control function didn&#8217;t work for me. I finally gave up and reverted back to the manual focus control. That&#8217;s the only gripe I have with the Canon EOS 3.</p>
<p>Look forward to Canon EOS 3D. In my view, it should at least have a full-frame sensor and high ISO 51,200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-212596</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-212596</guid>
		<description>The 3 was a truely great film camera. Bring on a digital version if this for us wedding photographers. 

To tge person above who scoffed at the useness of such a focusing system you should try before you comment. its like the guy who bags a ferrari BUT never driven one. FOOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3 was a truely great film camera. Bring on a digital version if this for us wedding photographers. </p>
<p>To tge person above who scoffed at the useness of such a focusing system you should try before you comment. its like the guy who bags a ferrari BUT never driven one. FOOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-201033</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-201033</guid>
		<description>Hi any more news on 3D  after the lunch of the 1D MK4 will it be next  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi any more news on 3D  after the lunch of the 1D MK4 will it be next  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppdix</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-178389</link>
		<dc:creator>ppdix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-178389</guid>
		<description>The original EOS 3 had Eye Control Focus. It makes sense for the 3D to be the one to bring it back.
For one, I hope they do bring it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original EOS 3 had Eye Control Focus. It makes sense for the 3D to be the one to bring it back.<br />
For one, I hope they do bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-160181</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-160181</guid>
		<description>whats the fps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats the fps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-71607</link>
		<dc:creator>gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-71607</guid>
		<description>anybody noticed the so called &quot;eye control&quot; on this camera? why would they  include that feature in this camera if no other recent model has it, for me is totally useless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anybody noticed the so called &#8220;eye control&#8221; on this camera? why would they  include that feature in this camera if no other recent model has it, for me is totally useless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-69824</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-69824</guid>
		<description>I agree with this assessment however the up and coming 3D will provide 65 focus points and 15 bit color.  I got this info from my friend&#039;s brother in law.  My friend&#039;s name is Mr. Pope of down under.  He has moved on to medium digital format however and is not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this assessment however the up and coming 3D will provide 65 focus points and 15 bit color.  I got this info from my friend&#8217;s brother in law.  My friend&#8217;s name is Mr. Pope of down under.  He has moved on to medium digital format however and is not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lekke</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-13025</link>
		<dc:creator>lekke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-13025</guid>
		<description>Right. 1.2 with that diameter??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. 1.2 with that diameter??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-eos-3d-large/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Canon 3D picture is bogus.  It&#039;s an amalgram of pics picked of of the dpreview.com site.  The body is a hacked up Canon 1DS MkII and the lens highlights come from the Nikon D200 preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 3D picture is bogus.  It&#8217;s an amalgram of pics picked of of the dpreview.com site.  The body is a hacked up Canon 1DS MkII and the lens highlights come from the Nikon D200 preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.490 seconds -->

