<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM</title>
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The amateur</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-174646</link>
		<dc:creator>The amateur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-174646</guid>
		<description>¨the lens is expected to appeal to serious amateur nature and sports photographers¨... 

I want to correct this ... the lens is expected to appeal to low budget nature and sports photographers... Using a L lens and a 5000$ camera don´t make you a professional...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>¨the lens is expected to appeal to serious amateur nature and sports photographers¨&#8230; </p>
<p>I want to correct this &#8230; the lens is expected to appeal to low budget nature and sports photographers&#8230; Using a L lens and a 5000$ camera don´t make you a professional&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lanier</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lanier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>That is remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
