<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 05:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-223723</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-223723</guid>
		<description>I posted new sample photos at 
http://lavisions.blogspot.com/2010/03/canon-ef-70-300-f4-56-is-usm-lens.html .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted new sample photos at<br />
<a href="http://lavisions.blogspot.com/2010/03/canon-ef-70-300-f4-56-is-usm-lens.html" rel="nofollow">http://lavisions.blogspot.com/2010/03/canon-ef-70-300-f4-56-is-usm-lens.html</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-217424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-217424</guid>
		<description>Really great review since most of the pix in it come back a Forbidden.  Try some that show up in larger size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great review since most of the pix in it come back a Forbidden.  Try some that show up in larger size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The amateur</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-174646</link>
		<dc:creator>The amateur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-174646</guid>
		<description>¨the lens is expected to appeal to serious amateur nature and sports photographers¨... 

I want to correct this ... the lens is expected to appeal to low budget nature and sports photographers... Using a L lens and a 5000$ camera don´t make you a professional...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>¨the lens is expected to appeal to serious amateur nature and sports photographers¨&#8230; </p>
<p>I want to correct this &#8230; the lens is expected to appeal to low budget nature and sports photographers&#8230; Using a L lens and a 5000$ camera don´t make you a professional&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lanier</title>
		<link>http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm-review-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lanier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-300-mm-f40-f56-is-usm/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>That is remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.444 seconds -->
